期刊文献+

儿童先天性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的腔内泌尿外科处理

Endoscopic Management of Congenital Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 研究小儿先天性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻 (UPJO)的腔内泌尿外科处理的可行性与疗效。 方法  2 0 0 0年 1月~ 2 0 0 2年 12月利用逆行气囊扩张、经皮肾顺行电刀与钬激光内切开两种方法 ,治疗 5~ 14岁UPJO患儿 2 2例 ,逆行气囊扩张 14例 ,电刀与钬激光内切开 8例。 结果 术后随访 3~ 2 6月 ,总有效率为 86 % (19/ 2 2 )。其中 1例顺行电刀内切开疗效不明显 ,改开放手术证实为UPJ异位血管压迫 ;2例气囊扩张 2次后疗效不明显 ,经顺行电刀与钬激光内切开。除经皮肾顺行电刀与钬激光内切开 8例患儿 ,术后 1~ 2d有轻微发热与患侧腹痛外 ,其余未出现并发症。 Objective To investigate the feasibility of endoscopic treatment for congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children. Methods From January 2000 to December 2002, 22 children with congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction, aged from 5 to 14, underwent percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy or balloon dilation. Result All cases were followed up for 3 to 26 months. The overall success rate was 86%(19/22). One uncured patient of antegrade electrocautery endopyelotomy was proven to be a crossing vessel during Anderson-Hynes pyelotomy. Two of repeated balloon dilation were later cured by antegrade electrocautery or laser endopyelotomy. Mild fever in postoperative 1~2 days and affected abdominal pain occurred in 8 cases of antegrade electrocautery or laser endopyelotomy.But no major complications occurred in all patients. Conclusion Endoscopic management of pediatric congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction is safe and effective.
出处 《中国现代手术学杂志》 2003年第5期356-358,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery
关键词 儿童 先天性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻 腔内泌尿外科 钬激光内切开 经皮肾顺行电刀 ureteropelvic junction obstruction(UPJO) ureteropelvic junction endourology child
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Wickham JE, Kellet M.L Percutaneous pyelolysis [ J ]. Eur Urol,1983,9(2) :122-124.
  • 2Badlani G. Eshghi M, Smith AD. Percutaneous surgery for ureteropelvic junction obslruction ( endopyelotomy ) : technique and early results[J]. J Urol, 1986,135(1 ) :26-28.
  • 3Inglis JA, Tolley DA. Ureteroscopic pyelolysis for pelviureteric junction obstruction[ J]. Br J Urol, 1986,58 (3) :250-252.
  • 4Chandhoke PS,Clayman BY,Stone AM,et al. Endopyelotomy and endoureteretomy with the acucise uretecal cutting balloon device:preliminary experience[J]. J Endourel, 1993,7( 1 ) :45-51.
  • 5Motola JA, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Results of 212 consecutive endopyelomies:an 8-year followup [ J ]. J Urol, 1993, 149 ( 3 ) :453-456.
  • 6Siegel YI, Lingeman JE. Percutaneous transilial access for stone removal in crossed fused renal ectopia[ J]. Urology, 1993,42(1) :82-85.
  • 7Gupta O, Tuncay OL, Smith AD. Open surgical exploration of failed endopyelotomy: a 12-year perspective[ J ]. J Urol, 1997,157(5) :1613-1618.
  • 8Meretyk I, Meretyk S, Clayman RV. Endopyelotomy:comparision of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous techniques[J]. J Urol, 1992,148(3) :775-782.
  • 9Shalhav AL, Giusti G, Elbahnasy AM, et al. Adult endopyelotomy :impact of etiology and antegrade versus retrograde approach on outcome[J]. J Urol,1998,160(3 Pt 1 ) :685-689.
  • 10Van Caugh PJ, Wilmart .IF, Opsomer ILl, et al.Long-term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelotomy: a critical analysis of prognostic factors[ J ]. J Urol, 1994,151 ( 4 ) : 934-937.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部