期刊文献+

显微内窥镜下腰椎间盘突出症治疗 被引量:4

Clinical Evaluation of Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 对比研究MED法与Love法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果。 方法  1999年 12月以来手术治疗单一节段腰椎间盘突出 70例 ,其中MED法与Love法各 35例 ,比较手术前后JOA评分 ,术后改善率 ,手术切口长度 ,出血量 ,手术时间 ,髓核摘除量 ,术后发热 ,术后下地时间。 结果 术前JOA评分MED组与Love组分别为 12 .2± 1.8与 12 .1± 1.4(t=0 .437,p =0 .6 6 3) ;术后JOA分别为 2 6 .9± 1.6和 2 6 .1± 5 .3(t=1.80 ,p =0 .0 77) ;改善率分别为 87.8%和 83 .1% (t=1.84,p =0 .0 6 9) ;手术切口长度分别为 (2 .0± 0 .1)cm和 (5 .0± 0 .6 )cm(t=2 6 .72 1,p <0 .0 0 1) ;出血量分别为 (41± 12 )ml和 (6 9± 15 )ml(t =11.16 7,p <0 .0 0 1) ;手术时间分别为 (6 9± 15 )分钟和 (5 6± 9)分钟 (t=4.0 5 7,p <0 .0 0 1) ;最高体温分别为 (36 .8± 0 .1)℃和 (37.5± 0 .3)℃ (t=10 .80 ,p <0 .0 0 1) ;髓核摘除量分别为 (1.6± 0 .4)g和 (2 .2± 0 .4)g(t=8.40 ,p <0 .0 0 1) ;术后下地时间分别为 (1±0 .5 )天和 (2 .5± 0 .5 )天 (t=11.95 ,p <0 .0 0 1)。 结论 MED组与Love组均取得了满意的效果 ,MED手术具有创伤小 ,恢复快。 Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of Microendoscopic Discectomy (MED) with love's method for the treatment of lumbar disk herniation. Methods Pre- and postoperative JOA score, the length of incision, blood lost, operative time existed weight of disk, body temperature variation and time on getting out of bed after operation were compared between the MED group and the love's method group randomized 35 cases respectively since December 1999. Results The preoperative JOA scores in the MED group and the love's method group were 12.1±1.8 and 12.1±1.4, respectively (t=0.437, P=0.663); The postoperative JOA scores in both groups were 26.9±1.6 and 26.1±5.3, respectively (t=1.81, P=0.0077); The length of incision were (2.0±0.1)cm and (5.0±0.6)cm, respectively (t=26.72, P<0.001); The rate of improved JOA score were 87.7% and 83.1%, respectively (t=1.84, P=0.069); Blood loss were (4.1±12)ml and (69±15)ml, respectively (t=11.67, P<0.001); operative time (69.5±15)min and (56±9)min, respectively (t=4.06, P<0.001); The highest body temperature were (36.8±0.1)℃ and (37.5±0.3)℃, respectively (t=10.08, P<0.01); The time one getting out of bed after surgery were (1±0.5) days and (2.5±0.5) days, respectively (t=11.95, P<0.001). Conclusions Both the MED method and the love method can obtain the same satisfied results of therapy, but the MED method has advantages of minimal invasion and shorter time of recovery.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2001年第6期359-361,共3页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 显微内窥镜 腰椎间盘突出症 手术治疗 临床表现 MED法 适应证 Love法 Microendoscopic Discectomy Lumbar disc Herniation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Foley KT and Smith MM. Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg, 1997, 3:301-307.
  • 2镇万新,王育才,马乐群,王巨.脊柱后路显微内窥镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中华骨科杂志,1999,19(8):460-462. 被引量:350
  • 3井上骏一.腰痛治疗成绩判定基准[J].日本骨外科学会杂志,1986,60:391-394.
  • 4吉田宗人 玉置哲也 角谷英树 他.Microendoscopic Discectomy法の适应と问题点[J].日整会志,2000,74:142-142.
  • 5山县正庸、高桥和久、守屋秀繁.腰椎间板ヘルニァに对する内视镜下椎间板ヘルニァ摘除术[J].脊椎脊髓,1999,12:921-926.
  • 6刘学勇,王欢,王海义.前、后入路腰间盘摘除术远期疗效对比分析[J].中华骨科杂志,1997,17(5):311-314. 被引量:45
  • 7泷田彦、大月健二.腰椎间板ヘルニァに对するLove法の长期成绩[J].整形外科,1998,49:257-261.
  • 8佑多和仁、铃木信治.腰椎间板ヘルニァに对する显微下手术后再发例の检讨[J].脊柱脊髓,2000,13:785-790.

二级参考文献10

  • 1徐印坎 贾连顺 等.新手术方法治疗获得性腰椎管狭窄症[J].中华骨科杂志,1992,12:37-40.
  • 2戴力扬 徐印坎 等.后部结构切除对腰椎稳定性影响生物力学研究[J].中华外科杂志,1988,26:272-275.
  • 3邵振海,靳安民,舒小秋,陈仲,余斌.小切口潜行开窗术摘除椎间盘突出远期随访[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1997,4(2):83-84. 被引量:43
  • 4马志新,中华创伤杂志,1993年,1卷,38页
  • 5周可光,中华骨科杂志,1988年,8卷,352页
  • 6陆裕朴,中华骨科杂志,1981年,1卷,77页
  • 7周人厚,中华骨科杂志,1981年,1卷,72页
  • 8邵振海,中国矫形外科杂志,1997年,4卷,83页
  • 9徐印坎,中华骨科杂志,1992年,12卷,37页
  • 10戴力扬,中华外科杂志,1988年,26卷,272页

共引文献412

同被引文献20

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部