期刊文献+

逻辑AI中的容变能力的研究

Elaboration Tolerance in Logical AI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1引言 John McCarthy[1]提出要达到更高级的智能,关键之一在于系统能有效地处理常识信息情境(common sense informat-ic situation).与常识信息情境相对的是有界信息情境(bounded informatic situation).在有界信息情境中,与实现目标相关的信息在系统构建前已经确定,即系统初始时拥有所需的全部信息. In this paper a survey of elaboration tolerance in logical AI is provided. John McCarthy views elaboration tolerance as the key property of any formalism that can represent information in the common sense informatic situation. The goal of studying elaboration tolerance is finding a formalism for describing problems logically that is as elaboration tolerant as natural language and the associated background knowledge. In the beginning, we introduce the missionaries and cannibals problem and its elaboration problems provided by John McCarthy as the test examples of studying elaboration tolerance. Then we introduce the study of elaboration tolerance from three aspects. First of all ?the study of elaboration tolerance of the existing systems is introduced such as Causal Calculator and ABSFOL. Second the study of special elaboration is presented such as elaboration of actions. Last but not least a formal definition of elaboration toleration and evaluation tools is provided.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2003年第9期31-34,共4页 Computer Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(60003010)
关键词 人工智能 逻辑系统 知识库 非单调推理 行动推理 AI 容变能力 常识推理系统 信息情境 Elaboration tolerance, Formal system. Common sense informatic situation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1McCarthy J. From here to human-level AI. In Knowledge Representation 96, p. 640-646.
  • 2McCarthy J. Elaboration tolerance. In Common Sense 98, London, Jan. 1998.
  • 3McCarthy J. Mathematical logic in artificial intelligence. Daedalus, 1988,117(1): 397-311.
  • 4Amir E. Towards a formalization of elaboration tolerance: adding and deleting axioms. Symposium on Abstraction, Reformulation and Approximation (SARA98), 1998.
  • 5Amir E. Machinery for elaborating action. Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Action, and Change, Nagoya, Japan 1997.
  • 6Amir E. Elaboration tolerance of logical theories. In: Proc of the Sixteenth National Conf on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'99), Doctoral Consortium, 1999.
  • 7Lifschitz V. Missionaries and Cannibals in the Causal Calculator. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. In: Proc of the Seventh Intl Conf (KR200),April 2000. 85-96.
  • 8McCain N, Turner H. Causal theories of action and change, on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'97), AAAI,1997. 480-485.
  • 9McCain N, the Texas Action Group. The causal calculator. http://www. cs. utexas. edu/users/tag/cc/.
  • 10Cimatti, Serafini. Multiagent reasoning with belief contexts Ⅱ : elaboration tolerance. In: Proc 1st Int Conf on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95), 1996.57-64.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部