期刊文献+

针刺、药物、电击三种房颤复律疗法的比较 被引量:2

A Comparative Study on Acupuncture, Drugs and Sideration for Auricular Fibrillation Conversion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文选择62例房颤患者,分别采用针灸、西药、电击等疗法进行复律,从而比较三种复律方法的临床疗效,探讨针灸对心脏复律的临床意义及理论基础。针刺复律取内关、郄门、大陵及人中。注重操作手法和量学要求。电击及药物复律均采用传统常规治疗。观察结果,针刺、电击、药物三种复律方法的成功率分别为75%,80%,76.4%,无统计学差异。临床研究表明,针刺转复房颤有安全、简易、无副作用等优点,尤适于老年患者,可作首选。 62 cases of AF were treated by acupunc- ture, drugs or sideration, in order to compare their clinical effects and approach the clinical significance and theorical basis of acupuncture for cardiaversion. The following acupoint prescription was appliecl with especial manipulations and suit- able amount of stimulation : Neiguan (PC6), Ximen (PC4), Daling (PC7), and Renzhong (DU26). Sideration and medicine were used in trditional routine way. The observation result indicated that the succssful rates of acupuncture, sideration and drugs were spparately 75%, 80% and 76.4%, that there was no significant statistic differ- ence among them. The clinical research showed the treatment of AF by acupuncture have such characteristics as safety, simplicity and no side effect. Acupuncture is especially suitable to old patients, and could be used as the first selected way.
出处 《上海针灸杂志》 1992年第3期9-10,共2页 Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词 房颤复律 针刺
  • 相关文献

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部