1[1]Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Barnaby C, et al. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet, 2002, 359: 1194-1199.
2[2]van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen E, et al. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation, 2001, 104: 1761-1766.
3[3]Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: A prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003, 125: 797-808.
4[4]Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, et al. Compare of stenting with minimally invasive bypass for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347: 561-566.
5[5]Drenth DJ, Veeger NJ, Winter JB,et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting with off-pump coronary surgery for high-grade stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: three-yearfollow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002, 40, 1955- 1960.
6[6]Cleveland JC, Shroyer AL, Chen AY, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001, 72: 1282-1289.
7[7]Gundry SR, Romano MA, Shattuck OH, et al. Seven-year follow-up of coronary artery bypasses performed with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1998, 115: 1273-1278.
8[8]Bonacchi M, Prifti E, MD, Giunti G, et al. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg, 2002, 73: 460-466.
9[9]Aris A, Ca′mara ML, Montiel J, et al. Ministernotomy versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg, 1999, 67: 1583-1588.
