期刊文献+

磁共振动态增强扫描对肾癌诊断价值的探讨 被引量:3

Contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of renal carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究动态增强磁共振扫描对肾癌的诊断价值和肾癌的强化特点。方法:对35例肾癌患者行SE序列T1WI,TSE序列T2WI,T1WI,T2WI压脂像,TFE序列动态增强及SE序列延迟T1WI扫描。计算并比较不同序列肿瘤-肾实质对比-噪声比(CNR)。计算增强后肾皮质、髓质、肿瘤的信号强度,并绘出曲线,分析各自不同的强化特点。结果:共检出肾癌35例,直径2~12cm。增强后各个序列图像CNR均较增强前有统计学意义(P<0.05),动态增强序列中肿瘤-肾髓质对比在140s左右最明显。结论:磁共振动态增强扫描是诊断肾癌的有效方法。 Objective:To evaluate the usefulness of pre-and post contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs).Methods:Thirty-five patients with thirty-five RCCs and one angiomyolipoma were studied by both conventional spin echo and dynamic contrast-en-hanced MRI.Dynamic MRI was performed with turbo field echo sequence after bolus injection of gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid(Gd-DTPA).Characterization of a renal mass was done by the visual analysis of tumor vascularity as well as quantitative assessment of the contrast noise ratio(CNR)and degree of the enhancement.Results:In the dynamic study the tumor /renal medulla contrast was most conspicuous at140s after initiation of bolus injection of contrast medium.The tumor /renal medulla contrast in the dynamic study was more markedly than that of precontrast T1-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging(P<0.05).The tumor /renal medulla contrast in precontrast T1WI SPIR and T2WI SPIR was more striking than in conventional T1-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging (P<0.05).Conclusion:Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is a useful technique for the diagnosis of RCCs,especially for the patient who is allergic to iodinated contrast material or has renal insufficiency.
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2003年第5期549-552,共4页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
关键词 磁共振成像 肾癌 快速场回波 动态增强 Maganetic Ransonance Imaging Renal Carcinoma Turbo Field Echo Dynamic Enhancement
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1杨远清,顾明祥,杨燮樵,缪光胜,范学海,李仲宜,殷民.磁共振成像在肾癌诊断与分期中的作用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(9):522-523. 被引量:3
  • 2Scattoni V, Colombo R, Nava L, et al. Imaging of renal cell carcinoma with galolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance: radiological and pathological study [J].Urol Int, 1995, 54(3):121.
  • 3Huch Boni RA, Debatin JF, Krestin GP. Contrastenhanced MR imaging of the kidneys and adrenalgl ands[J]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 1996, 40): 101
  • 4Takahashi s, Yeda J, Furukawa T, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: preoperative assessment for enucleative surgery with angiography, CT and MRI[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1996, 20(6): 863.
  • 5Reznek RH. Imaging in the staging of renal cell carcinoma[J]. Eur Radiol, 1996, 6(2): 120.
  • 6Yamashita Y, Honda S, Nishiharu T, et al. Detection of pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma with MR imaging and CT[J]. AIR, 1996, 166(5): 1151.
  • 7Narumi Y, Hricak H, Presti JC, et al. MR imaging evaluation of renal cell carcinoma[J]. Abdom Imaging. 1997, 22(2): 216.
  • 8Kreft BP, Muller Miny H, Sommer T, et al. Diagnostic value of MR imaging in comparison to CT in the detection and differential diagnosis of renal masses:ROC annlysis[J]. Eur Radiol. 1997; 7(4): 542.

二级参考文献1

  • 1杨远清,国外医学泌尿系统分册,1993年,13卷,63页

共引文献2

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部