摘要
以 2 37名运动员为对象对COPE量表中文版进行了研究分析 ,结果发现 :(1)新建构的COPE量表与原版量表 (5 3个条目构成 14个应对因子 )相比 ,在结构维度及项目组成上有所差异 ,即由 45个条目组成 9个应对因子 :寻求支持、主动应对、情绪宣泄、正面认识、抑制干扰性活动、忍受、求助宗教、逃避、克制性应对。量表具有较好的信度。 (2 )运动员较多采用的应对方式是“主动应对”、“忍受”、“寻求支持”及“情绪宣泄” ;较少采用的应对方式是“求助宗教”、“逃避”。男女运动员之间存在明显的差异 :女运动员比男运动员更倾向于采用“忍受”、“寻求支持”、“情绪宣泄”、“逃避” ;男运动员比女运动员更倾向于采用“主动应对”、“克制性应对”。 (3)人际关系比较紧张的运动员比对照组较多采用“情绪宣泄”、“忍受”、“逃避” ,而较少采用“寻求支持”、“正面认识”、“抑制干扰性活动”、“克制性应对”。
athletes were studied with COPE,it was found:(1)compared to original edition of COPE with 14 coping_dimensions and 53 items,the new COPE included 9 coping_dimensions with 45 intems:Seeking support,Active coping,Venting of emotions,Positive appraisal,Suppression of competing activities,Endure,Turning to religion,Avoidance and Restraint coping (2)athletes were more tendency to take such coping styles:Active coping,Endure,Seeking support,Venting of emotions,and less tendency to take such coping styles:Turning to religion,Avoidance,and there were obvious differences between male and female athlees in selecting coping styles (3)compared to de_tension group,those athletes who were tension for personal relationship were more tendency to take the passive coping styles(e g endure,avoidance,etc ),and less tendency to take the positive coping styles(e g seeking support,restraint coping,etc )
出处
《广州体育学院学报》
北大核心
2001年第2期52-56,共5页
Journal of Guangzhou Sport University