期刊文献+

312938例子宫颈脱落细胞学诊断的质量分析 被引量:5

Quality analysis of Papanicolaou smears of cervical exfoliative in cytology in 312938 women
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 分析 312 938例按巴氏分类标准诊断的宫颈脱落细胞学涂片中的阳性病例与组织病理学诊断的对照情况 ,强调在现实条件下细胞学检查中质量控制的方法及其重要性。方法 资料来源于 1994年 1月~ 2 0 0 2年 12月我院门诊和住院患者的子宫颈脱落细胞学涂片 ,全部病例采用传统抹片方法 ,巴氏染色 ,诊断按巴氏Ⅴ级分类法 ,登记并随访细胞学诊断的阳性病例 ,并与同期组织病理学诊断档案对照。结果  9年中共检查宫颈脱落细胞涂片 312 938例 ,巴氏Ⅲ级及Ⅲ级以上病例共 6 93例 ,阳性检出率为 2 .2‰ ,其中 386例 (5 5 .7% )获得组织病理学诊断对照。 386例中 ,巴氏Ⅲ、Ⅳ和Ⅴ级与组织病理学的实际符合率分别为 6 1.6 %、87.3%和 89.2 %。总体假阳性率为 15 .8% ,巴氏Ⅲ、Ⅳ和Ⅴ级的假阳性率则分别为 19.8%、12 .7%和 4 .6 % ,总体假阴性率为 2 8.6 %。巴氏Ⅲ级病例除有较高的假阳性率外 ,同时存在较高比例的过度诊断和诊断不足 ,分别为 18.6 %和 36 .8%。进一步分析表明 ,造成较高比例假阳性率和过度诊断的主要原因是对人乳头瘤病毒 (HPV)感染性病变的认识不足。结论 传统的巴氏分类标准对于肿瘤性病变的准确性是可接受的 ,但对于HPV感染性病变易作出假阳性诊断或过度诊断。加强对巴氏Ⅲ级涂片的管理及随? Objective To evaluate the quality control of Papanicolaou smears of the cervical cytology in 312 938 cases based on comparison of the histopathologic diagnoses and to emphasize the importance and quality assurance scheme of smeared cytology in clinical practice. Methods All individuals underwent Papanicolaou(Pap) smear with Pap staining. The cytodiagnosis was classified by the Papanicolaou smear. The positive cases were registered at the Department of Pathology of OBS & GYN Hospital affiliated to Fu Dan University. Results During January 1994-December 2002, 312 938 women underwent the Papanicolaou smear. 693 individuals were identified as positive, the positive rate was 2.2‰. Of these, 386 cases were compared with the controls by their histopathology. The sensitivities according to Class Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ were 61.6%, 87.3% and 89.2%, respectively. The overall false positive rate was 15.8%. The false positive rates of Class Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ were 19.8%, 12.7% and 4.6%, respectively and the overall false negative rate was 28.6%. Also, there were 18.6% overdiagnosed and 36.8% underdiagnosed in Class Ⅲ. The human papillary tumor virus(HPV) infection was accounted for the false positive and overdiagnosis in individuals of Class Ⅲ. Conclusion The accuracy rate of Papanicolaou Classification System for malignancies is acceptable, but it can lead to false positive and overdiagnosis in Class Ⅲ, which may be improved through administrative and follow-up examination of the positive cases.
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第10期702-705,共4页 Shanghai Medical Journal
关键词 子宫颈脱落细胞学诊断 质量控制 巴氏分类法 病理学诊断 假阳性 假阴性 Cervical cytology False Positive False Negative Papanicolaou Classification System
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1张惜阴 朱人烈 主编.临床妇科肿瘤学 第1版[M].上海:上海医科大学出版社,1992.83-85.
  • 2Cross P, Shiell A. Cervical cytology EQA-the Northern experience. Cytopathology, 2001, 12: 94-103.
  • 3Yoshida Y, Sato S, Okamura C, et al. Evaluating the accuracy of uterine cancer screening with the regional cancer registration system. Acta Cytol, 2001, 45: 157-162.
  • 4Colgan TJ, Woodhouse SL, Styer PE, et al. Reparative changes and the false-positive/false-negative Papenicolaou test: a study from the College of American Pathologists lnterlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2001, 125: 134-140.
  • 5Pan Q, Belinson JL, Li L, et al. A thin-layer, liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional, comparative study. Acta Cytol, 2003, 47: 45-50.
  • 6Park IA, Lee SN, Chae SW, et al. Comparing the accuracy of ThinPrep Pap tests and conventional Papanicolaou smears on the basis of the histologie diagmosis: a clinical study of women with cervical abnormalities. Acta Cytol, 2001, 45: 525-531.

同被引文献42

  • 1任常,彭芝兰,许良智,吴泰相,刘关键,杨开选.两种宫颈癌前病变诊断方法的评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2004,4(9):595-601. 被引量:6
  • 2Solomon D, Davey D, Kunnan R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology [ J ]. The Journal of American Medical Association, 2002 (287): 2114.
  • 3Coste J, Atrix B, Priollet C, et al. Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear monolayer cytology and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervilca cancer screening [ J ]. British Medical Journal, 2003, 326 (4) : 1.
  • 4Renshaw A, Young N, Birdsong G, et al. Comparison of performance of conventional and thinPrep gynecologic preparation in the college of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program [J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2004, 128 (1): 17.
  • 5Baker R, Sullivan J, Hanley J. The characteristics of false negative cervical smears-implications for the UK cervical cancer screening programme [J]. J Clin Pathol, 1999, 52: 358.
  • 6Linder J, Zahniser D. ThinPrep Papanieolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology [ J ]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 1998, 122 (2): 139.
  • 7Syrjanen S, Shabalova IP, Petrovichev Net al. Human papillomavirus testing and conventional Pap Smear cytology as optional screening tools of women at different risks for cervical cancer in countries of the former Soviet Union [ J ] . J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2002, 6:97.
  • 8Anjali Limaye. Comparative analysis of conventional Papanieolaou tests and a fluid - based thin - layer method [ J ] . Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2003, 127 (2): 200.
  • 9Renshaw A, Young N, Birdsong G et al. Comparison of performance off conventional and thin Prep gynecologic preparation in the college of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program [ J ] . Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2004, 128 (1) : 17.
  • 10Baker R, Sullivan J, Hanley J. The characteristics of false negative cervical smears - implications for the UK cervical cancer screening programme [J] . J Clin Pathol, 1999, 52:358.

引证文献5

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部