期刊文献+

同源宾语的格问题初探

Remarks on the Case of Cognate Object
下载PDF
导出
摘要 很多人认为同源宾语结构中的动词为不及物动词,没有赋格的能力,所以其后所接的名词短语(NP)不是动词宾语,而是无格的附加语(adjunet).因为有格的名词或名词短语,必须符合θ准则(θ-Critedon)和经受格鉴别式(Case-Filter)的鉴别;而附加语无格,不要经过格鉴别式,而且不在θ准则的应用范围之内.文章试图通过对这些观点进行分析,结合乔姆斯基的管约理论(Government-Binding Theory)和对动词语义结构的分析,认为同源宾语由该结构中隐含语义因子[CAUSE]赋予宾格. In GB framework,θ-criterion and case-filter determine the distribution of NPs in English. Such English verbs as die, live , dream etc. are typical intransitive verbs which are semantically one-place predicates. Without θ-role , cognate objects of these verbs have been argued not to be object but to be caseless adjunct. This paper aims to show that there is no adequate and even some improper treatment of cognate object in English ,and to suggest a more satisfactory approach to the phenomena involved, that is , according to the semantic representation of this kind of structure, we argue that cognate object receives case from the implied semantic feature of the structure.
作者 李艳花
出处 《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》 2002年第3期94-96,共3页 Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition
关键词 同源宾语 动词 附加语 名词 θ准则 格鉴别式 英语 Cognate object argument adjunct
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1Chomsky,N.Lectures on Government and Binding[]..1981
  • 2Hornstein,N.Logical Form: from GB to minimalism[]..1996
  • 3Davis,L. J.Remarks on the theta criterion and Case[].Linguistic Inquiry.1986
  • 4Radford,A.Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English[]..1997
  • 5Chomsky,N.Knowledge of Language : Its Nature , Origins and Use[]..1986
  • 6Chomsky,N.The Minimalist Program (Second Edition)[]..1995
  • 7Li,Yan-hui.Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese[]..1990
  • 8Culicover,P. W.Principles and Parameters : An Introduction to Syntactic Theory[]..1997
  • 9Cook,V. and Newson,M.Chomsky s Universal Grammar : An Introduction (Second Edition)[]..1996
  • 10Jones,M. L.Cognate objects and the Case-filter[].Journal of Linguistic Anthropology.1988

共引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部