期刊文献+

腹膜透析对尿毒症患者生活质量的影响 被引量:9

The Effect of Peritoneal Dialysis on Life Quality in End StageRenal Disease Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的该文旨在观察规律性腹膜透析患者(2年左右)和刚开始腹透的尿毒症患者生活质量的不同,以比较腹膜透析对患者生活质量的影响。 方法78例腹透患者,规律性腹透(A组)45例,平均腹透龄24±16.6月;刚开始透析(B组)33例,平均腹透龄3.8±3.1月,用SF-36生活质量询问表进行评估。 结果A组患者的生活质量评分高于B组,尤其在躯体痛苦、情感问题所导致的角色限制和情感健康三项指标中差异显著(P均<0.05)。SF-36总分与腹透龄呈正相关(r=0.30,P=0.0039);两组营养状态无显著差异,透析均达充分性水平(P>0.05)。 结论随着腹透治疗的进行,患者生活质量逐步上升,从生活质量角度提示腹透是终末期患者的良好选择。 Objective The purpose of this study was to compare quality of life between long -term peritoneal dialysis ( PD) patients and new PD patients. Methods 78 patients were divided into long - term PD group ( group A, 45 ) and new PD group ( group B, 33 ). Average of PD duration in two groups were 24±16.6 months and 3. 8±3. Imonths. Quality of life was evaluated by the 36 -item short form health survey questionnaire (SF -36) , which contains eight domains. Adequacy (Kt/V, Ccr) and nutritional status (NPCR, sAlb, Hb) were also measured. Results According to SF -36, patients in group A had significantly higher scores in bodily pain, emotional well - being and role limitations caused by emotional problems, than those in group B (P all <0.05). The total SF -36 scores were positively correlated with PD duration. There are no differences between two groups in nutritional status. Adequacy of dialysis in both groups was reasonable. Conclusion Quality of life in PD patients will be getting better gradually with the time on PD. It is suggested that PD is a good choice for ESRD patients with respect to quality of life.
出处 《上海第二医科大学学报》 CSCD 2003年第6期538-540,544,共4页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Secondae Shanghai
关键词 腹膜透析 尿毒症 生活质量 营养状态 peritoneal dialysis life quality adequacy nutritional status
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1姚强,钱家麒,袁训初.抑郁障碍对腹膜透析患者的影响[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2001,17(2):123-125. 被引量:27
  • 2Korevaar JC, Jansen MAM, Merkus MP, et al. Quality of life in predialysis ESRD patients at the initiation of dialysis therapy [J].Peritoneal Dial Int, 2000,20( 1 ) :69- 75.
  • 3Korevaar JC, Jansen MAM, Dekker FW, et al. Changes in quality of life after the first three months of chronic dialysis treatment, the NECOSAD-2 Study[J]. Peritoneal Dial Int, 2001,21(6) :595-601.
  • 4Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 - item short form health survey (SF - 36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection [ J ].Med Care, 1992,30:473 - 483.
  • 5Mc Homey CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36 - item short form health survey (SF -36).Ⅱ . Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs[J]. Med Care ,1993,31:247 -263.
  • 6Diaz -Buxo JA, Lowrie EG, Lew NL, et al. Quality of life evaluation using short form 36 : Comparison in HD and PD patients [J].Am J Kidney Dis, 2000,35(2) :293 -300.
  • 7Valderrabano F, Jofre R, Lopez - Gomez JM. Quality of life in ESRD patients[J]. Am J Kidney Dis ,2001,38(3) :443 -464.
  • 8Shidler NR, Peterson RA, Kimmel PL, et al Quality of life and psychosocial relationships in patients with chronic renal insufficiency[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 1998,32:557 -566.
  • 9Moreno F, L pez G mez JM, Sanz Guajardo D, et al. The Spanish Cooperative Renal Patients Quality of Life Study Group: Quality of life in dialysis patients. A Spanish multicentre study [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant , 1996,11 ( suppl 2 ) : S125 - 129.
  • 10Schaefer K, Rohrich B. The dilemma of renal replacement therapy in patients over 80 years of age[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1996,14:35-36.

二级参考文献2

  • 1Lye W C,Adv Perit Dial,1997年,13卷,134页
  • 2沈渔邨,精神病学(第3版),1994年,644页

共引文献26

同被引文献97

引证文献9

二级引证文献142

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部