期刊文献+

论国际商事仲裁协议的准据法 被引量:5

On the evidential method in arbitration agreement for international commercial affairs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际商事仲裁协议的特点决定了它不能适用普通的合同法律适用规则,必须有自己的冲突规则来指引准据法的选择。意思自治的原则同样适用于仲裁协议,而且在当事人无明示选择仲裁协议所应适用的法律时,适用仲裁地法被广泛接受。中国在国际商事仲裁协议准据法方面存在着许多问题,需尽快解决。 The characteristics of the arbitration agreement for international commercial affairs determine that such an agreement cannot be applied with the rules appropriate to those general laws of agreement, but should instead have its conflict rules to guide the choice of evidential method. The principle of purported autonomy is also appropriate to the arbitration agreement. When the concerned person has not any clear option for the laws applied to the arbitration agreement, the location principle for the arbitration is generally accepted. There are many problems for China in the evidential method of international commercial affairs to be resolved as soon as possible.
作者 姜茹娇
出处 《中国青年政治学院学报》 CSSCI 2003年第5期110-115,共6页 Journal of China Youth College for Political Sciences
关键词 国际商事仲裁协议 准据法 意思自治原则 仲裁地法 arbitration agreement of international commercial affairs evidential method principle of purported autonomy location principle for arbitration
  • 相关文献

同被引文献39

  • 1余先予,徐红卫.国际商事仲裁协议的法律适用[J].政治与法律,2000(6):39-43. 被引量:4
  • 2朱继胜,高剑平.自然法思想与CAFTA争端解决机制[J].经济与社会发展,2007,5(7):114-116. 被引量:5
  • 3约斯特·鲍威林著.周忠海译.国际公法规则之冲突.法律出版社.2005年版.
  • 4最高人民法院经济庭.经济审判指导与参考.1999年.
  • 5《中华人民共和国政府关于菲律宾共和国所提南海仲裁案管辖权问题的立场文件》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_chn/zyxw_602251/t1217144.shtml,访问日期:2014年12月12日.
  • 6Notification and Statement of Claim on West Philippine Sea, January 22, 2013.
  • 7"Land Reclamation in and around the Straits of Johor" ( Malaysia v. Singapore ) ( Provisional Measures ) , October 8, 2003, ITLOS Rep. , para. 11.
  • 8"Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination"( Georgia v. Russian Federation) , ICJ Rep. , 2011, para. 161.
  • 9Barbados v. Trinidad and Tobago", Vol. 27, 2006, R. I. 1. A. , para. 213.
  • 10"Island of Palmas Case ( Netherlands v. USA)", R. 1. A. A. , Vol. 2, 1928, p. 845.

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部