期刊文献+

判断偏差分析的认知-生态取样途径 被引量:6

A Cognitive-Ecological Sampling Approach To Judgment Biases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对判断偏差的研究曾主要侧重于考察个体的动机和认知缺陷,而近期从认知-生态取样角度对判断偏差进行的研究则表明,判断偏差源于人与环境的交互作用。从认知-生态取样角度分析人的判断偏差着重考察以下四方面的问题:基于样本的判断涉及的多个变量,现实环境中刺激的分布,取样过程及其结果,取样过程中的心理预设与限制。认知-生态取样角度的研究对判断偏差产生的原因提供了一种全新的解释,同时,它也存在一些亟待解决的问题。 Lots of research on judgment biases held assumptions that the judgment biases were derived from the individuals motives and cognitive shortcomings. However, the studies of cognitive-ecological sampling offered an alternative account that the sampling process was not fully under the individual抯 cognitive control but was greatly affected by the distribution of information in the environment. The resulting samples tend to be biased for the interaction between cognition and the environment, and the sampling biases carry over to subsequent judgments. From the cognitive-ecological approach, the studies of judgment biases should focus on the following four aspects: the variants of sample-based judgment,the distribution of stimuli in the environment, the sampling process and the resulting samples, psychological assumptions and limitations. Future research issues are presented and discussed.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2003年第6期601-606,共6页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 中国科学院心理研究所创新工程重点项目 科技部973项目(G1998030508) 自然科学基金委面上项目(30270466)。
关键词 判断偏差 认知-生态取样 取样偏差 刺激分布 元认知 judgment bias, cognitive-ecological sampling, sampling bias, distribution of stimuli, meta-cognition.
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Fiedler K. Beware of sample! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 2000, 107(4): 659~676
  • 2Fiedler K, Walther E, Armbruster T, Fay D, Naumann U. Do you really know what you have seen? Instruction errors and presupposition effect in constructive memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1996, 32:484~511
  • 3Nisbett R E, Ross L. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980
  • 4Wells G L, Windschitl P D. Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999, 25:1115~1125
  • 5Johnson M K, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay D S. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114:3~28
  • 6Evans J St B T. Biases in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences. Howe, UK: Erlbaum, 1989
  • 7Wood J. Theory and research concerning social comparisons and personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 1989, 106:231~248
  • 8Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, 108:480~498
  • 9Fiedler K, Armbruster T. Two halfs may be more than one whole: Category-split effects on frequency illusions. Journal of Personality and social psychology, 1994, 66:633~645
  • 10Kareev Y. Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations. Psychological Review, 2000, 107:397~402

同被引文献102

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部