“非升即走”规则的经济学分析被引量：1

导出

摘要主要介绍了研究人力资源管理的一种新思路:人力资源管理经济学。人力资源管理经济学把经济学术语运用到人力资源管理领域,用经济学概念来解决人事上的问题,注重人事现象中的经济理性。本文着重分析了北大人事改革选择非升即走规则的原因。最后阐述了人力资源管理经济学存在的不足与研究前景。

作者肖翔

机构地区浙江大学管理学院

出处《中国人力资源开发》 2003年第10期13-14,共2页 Human Resources Development of China

关键词 “非升即走”规则经济学分析人力资源管理人力资源管理经济学北京大学人事改革

参考文献6

1Bruce E Kaufman.Expanding the behavioral foundations of labor economics.[J]. Industrial & Labor Relations Review; 1999 ,4:361-392.
2Edward P. Lazear TheFuture of Personnel Economics The Economics Journal 2000,11.611-639.
3Edward P. Lazear.Personnel Economics: Past Lessons and Future Directions.[J]Journal of Labor Economics,1999,17-2:198-236.
4Morley Gunderson.Economics of personnel and human resource management [J].Human Resource Management Review 2001,11. 431-452.
5爱德华·拉齐尔.《人事管理经济学》[M].北京大学出版社,2000.31-32.
6董志强.延期报酬理论及其在我国的应用[J].经济管理,2001,27(18):19-22. 被引量：6

1爱德华·拉齐尔.《人事管理经济学》[M].北京大学出版社,2000.31-32.
2Hutechens, Robert M. (1989), Seniority, wages and Productivity: A turbulent Decade,Journal of Economics Perspectives 3 : 49-64.
3Lazear, Edward P,(1979), Why is There Mandatory Retirement?, Journal of Political Economy 87:1261-84.
4Lazear, Edward P.(1981), Agency, Earnings Profiles, Productivity,And Hours Restrictions, American Econonic Review 71:606-20.
5Lazear, Edward P. (1998), personnel Economics For Managers,New Yourk:John Wiley & Sons.
6Lazear, Edward P.(1999), Personnel Economics:Past Lessons and Future Directions, NBER Working Paper No. 6957.
7Lazear, Edward P. ,and Rosen, Sherwin,(1981),Experience, Performance, and Earning, Quarterly Journal of Economics 95:703-36.
8Spitz,Janet,(1991), "Productivity and Wage Relations in Economic Theory and Labor Markets," Doctoral Dissertation, stanford University Graduated School of Bussiness, 1991.
9Rosen, Stephen,(1986), Prizes and Incentives in Elimination Tournaments, American Economic Review 76:701-15.

1陈钊,子璇(校对).创新的价值、非对称信息与终身教职制度——兼论中国的高等教育改革[J].经济研究,2006,41(6):101-111. 被引量：29
2郭建.哈佛大学发展史研究[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2000.247,144,47.
3[美]R·K·默顿.科学社会学(上册)[M].鲁旭东,林聚任,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
4Charles Kahn, Gur Huberman. Two-sided Uncertainty and "Up-or-Out" Contracts. Journal of Labor Economics, 1988,6, (4) :423-444.
5]Diane Gillespie,Nives Dolsak,etc. Research Circles:Sup- porting the Scholarship of Junior Faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 2005,30, (3) : 149- 162.
6Richard P. Chait,Andrew T. Ford. Beyond Traditional Tenure: Extended Probationary Periods and Suspension of "Up-or-out" Rule. Change, 1982,14, (5) :44-54.
7Aloysius Siow. Tenure and Other Unusual Personnel Practices in Academia. JLEO, 1998,14, ( 1 ) : 152-173.
8No Writer Attributed. Yale Adopts 'Up or Out' Tenure Policy For Faculty; Similar to Harvard's Plan:President Seymour Inaugurates System to Give Security, Flexibility. The Harvard Crimson,Nov. 15,1939. Retrieved Apr.27, 2012,from http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1939/11/15/ yale-adopts-up-or-out-tenure/.
9Edward P. Lazear. Personnel Economics:Past Lessons and Future Directions. Journal of Labor Economics, 1999,17, (2): 199-236.
10Michael Waldman. Up-or-Out Contracts: A Signal- ing Perspectives. Journal of Labor Economics, 1990,8, (2) :230-250.

中国人力资源开发

2003年第10期

内容加载中请稍等...