期刊文献+

头孢丙烯与头孢克洛随机对照治疗下呼吸道感染患者的临床评价 被引量:2

Randomized controlled clinical trial of cefprozil vs cefaclor in treatment of lower respiratory tract infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价头孢丙烯与头孢克洛随机对照治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效和安全性。方法 轻、中度下呼吸道感染患者 12 0例随机分成两组 ,头孢丙烯组 6 2例予头孢丙烯 5 0 0mg ,口服 ,2次 /d ;头孢克洛组 5 8例予头孢克洛5 0 0mg ,口服 ,3次 /d。两组均以 7~ 14天为 1个疗程。结果 头孢丙烯组与头孢克洛组的临床有效率分别为 91.9%与 89.7% (P >0 .0 5 ) ,细菌消除率为 89.8%与 88.9% (P >0 .0 5 ) ,两组均无明显不良反应。结论 头孢丙烯可作为治疗轻。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefprozil in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with mild to moderate lower respiratory tract infection were divided into two groups. Sixty two patients were treated with cefprozil 500 mg, orally,twice a day, Fifty eight patients were treated with cefaclor 500 mg,orally,threetimes a day. In both groups 7-14 d was a treatment course. Results The total clinical effective rates of cefprozil and cefaclor were 91.9 % and 89.7 % ( P > 0.05 ), respectively. The bacterial clearance rates were 89.8 % and 88.9 % ( P > 0.05 ), respectively. Both groups showed no obvious adverse reactions. Conclusion Cefprozil is a safe and potent antibacterial agent in treating mild to moderate lower respiratory tract infection.
出处 《临床荟萃》 CAS 北大核心 2003年第21期1221-1223,共3页 Clinical Focus
关键词 头孢丙烯 头孢克洛 呼吸道感染 随机对照治疗 疗效 安全性 临床评价 cefprozil cefaclor respiratory tract infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献10

  • 1王建平,辛洪涛,郑秀兰.头孢克洛治疗呼吸道感染的临床试验[J].新药与临床,1994,13(5):267-269. 被引量:7
  • 2何平,马宗生.希刻劳治疗呼吸道细菌性感染102例临床观察[J].中国实用内科杂志,1996,16(8):474-474. 被引量:2
  • 3[1]WISE R.Comparative microbiological activity and pharmacokinetics of cefprozil[J].Eur J Clin Mcrobiol Infect Dis,1994,13(10):839-845.
  • 4[2]SCHATZ BS,KARAVOKIROS KT,TAEUBEL MA,et al.Comparison of cefprozil,cefpodoxime proxetil,loracarbef,cefixime,and ceftibuten[J].Ann Pharmacother,1996,30(3):258-268.
  • 5[3]DOERN GV,BRUEGGEMANN AB,HUYNH H,et al.Antimicrobial resistance with Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States,1997-98[J].Emerg Infect Dis,1999,5(6):757-765.
  • 6[4]McCARTY JM.Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil versus penicillin,cefaclor and erythromycin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis[J].Europ J Clin Mcrobiol Infect Dis,1994,13(10):846-850.
  • 7[5]BALL P.Efficacy and safety of cefprozil versus other beta-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections[J].Europ J Clin Mcrobiol Infect Dis,1994,13(10):851-856.
  • 8[6]KAFETZIS DA.Multi-investigator evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cefprozil,amoxicillin-clavulanate,cefixime and cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media[J].Europ J Clin Mcrobiol Infect Dis,1994,13(10):857-865.
  • 9[7]NOLEN T.Comparative studies of cefprozil in the management of skin and soft-tissue infections[J].Europ J Clin Mcrobiol Infect Dis,1994,13(10):866-871.
  • 10[8]PELLETIER LL.The safety profile of cefprozil and other oral antimicrobial agents[J].Infect Med,1997,14 Suppl A:21-30.

共引文献13

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部