期刊文献+

社交回避与苦恼量表在学生群体中的信效度研究 被引量:93

The Validity and Reliability of Social Avoidance and Distress Scale in Chinese Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of Social Avoidance and Distress Scale(SAD) for conforming its applicability in Chinese students. Methods: A total of 598 undergraduates, 259 high school students were administered five self-reported scales: Social Avoidance and Distress Scale, Interaction Anxiousness Scale, Self-rating Anxiety Scale, Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, and Self-Rating Depression Scale. Results: Cronbach α of SAD was 0.85. The test-retest correlation was 0.76. The results of confirmatory factor analyses supported its 2-factor model. The correlation scores of SAD with the homogeneous scales were higher than that with heterogeneous scales. Conclusion: SAD had good psychometric properties applied in Chinese students. Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of Social Avoidance and Distress Scale(SAD) for conforming its applicability in Chinese students. Methods: A total of 598 undergraduates, 259 high school students were administered five self-reported scales: Social Avoidance and Distress Scale, Interaction Anxiousness Scale, Self-rating Anxiety Scale, Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, and Self-Rating Depression Scale. Results: Cronbach α of SAD was 0.85. The test-retest correlation was 0.76. The results of confirmatory factor analyses supported its 2-factor model. The correlation scores of SAD with the homogeneous scales were higher than that with heterogeneous scales. Conclusion: SAD had good psychometric properties applied in Chinese students.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 2003年第4期279-281,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 社交焦虑 学生群体 信效度 测量 量表 临床筛查 Social Avoidance and Distress Scale Chinese students Validity Reliability.
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献13

共引文献136

同被引文献848

引证文献93

二级引证文献800

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部