期刊文献+

历史文献注释论述赘言 被引量:2

The Discussion on Annotation of Historical Document
下载PDF
导出
摘要 史注滥觞于先秦、秦汉时解释经典的传注,而非刘、章所说始于汉晋以后;萌芽时期的史注有独立阐述式与随文自释式两种形态。魏晋和唐代是史注发展变化的两大关键时期。史注的衰亡有四大原因,其中自注的充分发展起了重要作用。 The annotation of historical document first appeared preQin, Qin and Han Dynasty when people annotated Confucian classics. It not appeared after Han and Jin dynasty as Liu and Zhang said. At the beginning, the annotation had two forms. One was to elaborate separately, the other was elaborate after the document weir. Jin and Tang Dynasty are the two key periods for the development of the historical document annotation. The decline of the annotation has four reasons, in which the form that the writer himself makes notes plays an important role.
出处 《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》 北大核心 2003年第6期75-78,共4页 Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
关键词 史注 产生 发展 自注 历史文献 historical document annotation come into being development the annotation which is made by the writer himself.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]浦起龙.史通通释*补注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978.
  • 2[2]叶瑛.文史通义校注* 史注[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
  • 3[8]班固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1987.
  • 4[6]周予同.中国历史文选:上册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.
  • 5[12]杨树达.古书疑义举例续补[M].长沙家刻,1924.

共引文献8

同被引文献68

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部