期刊文献+

转换的耕作:从农业史到食物体系史 被引量:2

Shifting Cultivation: From the History of Agriculture to the History of Food Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文的目的是为了运用一个新的完整的概念来研究农业历史,这一概念使得农业生产与销售、分配等有机地联系起来。原因有两个:其一是因为许多从事农业史的学者将自己限制在农业生产之中,以至于他们不能有效地把握农业因素与其它社会因素之间的关系。其二是因为在现代生活中随着农业的地位越来越变得相对下降,特别是在研究者将农业孤立于社会和经济生活之外的时候,越来越少的学者有兴趣来研究农业史。由于强烈地受到由诺贝尔奖得主威斯利·里昂提夫所创立的投入产出分析理论,特别是戴维斯和高登博格将其运用于农业史研究中的影响,作者展示了系统的概念,提供了大量的例子说明如何将系统的概念应用于实际之中,忠告从事农业史研究的学者遵循。作者认为,只有这样,我们不仅能够写出更加准确的农业史,而且会吸引更多的研究者进入这一领域。 The author makes the case for a new integrated approach to the study of agricultural history, which approach explicitly connects matters pertaining to agricultural production, broadly conceived, to those pertaining to distribution and consumption. He does so for two principal reasons: (1) because most scholarly approaches to agricultural history have focused so closely on production itself that they have not been able sufficiently to appreciate the relationship between the a-gricultural sector and other sectors of society; and (2) because, as agriculture becomes relatively less important in modern life, fewer and fewer students are interested in studying agricultural history, particularly when it is studied in isolation from other realms of economic and social life. Drawing heavily on the economic approach known as input-output analysis associated with the Nobel Prize-winning economist Wassily Leontief, particularly as it was adapted to agriculture by John H. Davis and Ray A. Goldberg, the author lays out his 'systems' approach to agricultural history, provides a series of examples of how the approach might be applied, and exhorts other a-gricultural historians to follow suit. According to the author, they would in so doing not only write better agricultural history, but also attract more students into the field.
出处 《古今农业》 2003年第1期46-55,共10页 Ancient and Modern Agriculture
关键词 农业史 食物体系 食物体系史 系统 季后行为 科研 Shifting Cultivation History of Agriculture History of Food Systems
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Louis A. Ferleger."A World of Farmers. But Not a Farmer’’s World,"[].Journal of the Historical Society.2002
  • 2Tom Vanderbilt.The Sneaker Book: Anatomy of an Industry and an Icon[]..1998
  • 3Eugne D. Genovese."American Slaves and Their History,"[].Genovese In Red and Black: Marxian Explorations in Southern and Afro-American History.1972
  • 4Leontief.Input-Output Economics[]..1966
  • 5Davis,Goldberg.A Concept of Agribusiness[]..
  • 6Peter A. Coclanis."Food Chains: The Burdens of the (Re) Past,"[].Agricultural History.1998
  • 7Primack." Land Clearing under Nineteenth-Century Techniques: Some Preliminary Considerations,"[].Journal of Economic History.1962
  • 8Robert L. Oehrtman,L. D. Schnake." Marketing Channels and Storage,"[].Grain Marketing.1993
  • 9Joseph Needham.Science and Civilization in China[]..1954
  • 10John M. Connor,William A. Scheik.Food Processing: An Industrial Powerhouse in Transition[]..1997

同被引文献30

  • 1黄绮文.包世臣的《郡县农政》[J].江淮论坛,1963(1):41-44. 被引量:2
  • 2许欣.江召棠的《种田杂说》[J].农业考古,1987(2):69-74. 被引量:3
  • 3明·宋应星.天工开物[M].潘吉星译.上海:上海古籍出版社.2008.
  • 4董恺忱,范楚玉.《中国科学技术史·农学卷》,科学出版社,2000.
  • 5王永厚.《包世臣及其<郡县农政>》[J].安徽农业科学,1982,(3).
  • 6姚昆德.《远见卓识的农学家包世臣》,载张波等编《中国古代农学家小传》,陕西科学技术出版社,1984年.
  • 7徐旺生.《包世臣》,载杜石然主编.《中国古代科学家传记》(下册),科学出版社,1993年.
  • 8[德]斯宾格勒.西方的没落[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江教育出版社,1988..
  • 9[英]赫胥黎.天演论[M].严复译著,李珍评注.北京:华夏出版社,2002.
  • 10韩鄂的《四时纂要》也粗具农家月令书特征,但通观全书,真正与农业生活有关的项目有限,而迷信内容却占据了很大篇幅;元代鲁明善的《农桑衣食撮要>可谓真正意义上的农家月令,内容简明切实,基本上剔除了商业内容记述和迷信色彩,是专门为自给自足的农民家庭生活服务的,从月令体裁农书反映的管理思想转化而言,其延续了管理思想在微观层次上的发展.参见惠富平、牛文智:《中国农书概说>,西安地图出版社,1999年,第42页.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部