期刊文献+

舒巴坦与拉氧头孢配比对产酶菌的体外抗菌活性研究 被引量:3

Comparative in vitro activity of Latamoxef/Sulbactam
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价拉氧头孢与舒巴坦的不同配比对143株临床分离产酶菌的体外抗菌作用。方法用平皿二倍稀释法对拉氧头孢/舒巴坦与三代头孢菌素头孢噻肟和舒巴坦复合抗生素氨苄西林/舒巴坦及头孢哌酮/舒巴坦的体外抗菌作用进行了测定。结果拉氧头孢对6种标准超广谱β内酰胺酶TEM-1、TEM-3、SHV-1、SHV-2、SHV-5、SHV-18具有高度的稳定性,MIC≤1.0μg/mL;对去遏制持续高产AmpC酶标准菌株的MIC=8.0μg/mL。对临床分离的ESBL_s菌株的MIC_(50)值拉氧头孢(0.5μg/mL)比头孢噻肟、氨苄西林/舒巴坦和头孢哌酮/舒巴坦分别低32倍、64倍和16倍、敏感率大99.1%。对临床分离产AmpC酶菌株的MIC_(50)值(8.0μg/mL)分别比头孢噻肟、氨苄西林/舒巴坦低4倍和8倍,与头孢哌酮/舒巴坦相同,敏感率为81.0%;对临床分离产SSBL菌株的MIC_(50)值(16μg/mL)比头孢噻肟、氨苄西林/舒巴坦低8倍,与头孢哌酮/舒巴坦相同,敏感率为41.7%;对临床分离高产诱导酶菌株的敏感率为100%。各种比例的舒巴坦都不能降低拉氧头孢对标准产酶株和临床产酶株的MIC值。结论拉氧头孢对临床分离的各种产酶菌耐药率极低,对包括质粒及染色体介导的各种β内酰胺酶的稳定性较高,可作为临床治疗由肠杆菌科细菌所致医院内感染的用药。 To study the in vitro activity of Latamoxef/Sulbactam. METHODS The in vitro combination antibacterial ac- tivities were studied by using two - fold plate dilution methods. RESULTS The results showed that Latamoxef was more active including TEM - 1、TEM - 3、SHV - 1、SHV - 2、SHV - 5、SHV - 18 (MIC≤1.0mg/L), and AmpC β lactamase (MIC = 8.0mg/L). Latamoxef could decreased the MIC_(50) of cefotaxime, ampicillin/sulbactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam against produce extended ? spectrum beta - lacta- mase (ESBLs) strain 32、64、16 folds and produce AmpC β lactamase strain 4、8、0 folds and produce super _ spectrum beta lactermbses (SSBL) strain 8, 8, 0 folds. The susceptible rates of Latamoxef were 99.1%、81.0%、41、7%、100% with ESBLsstrain, AmpC β lacta- mase strain, SSBL strain, inducible β lactamase strain. CONCLUSIONS Latamoxef were the most active antibiotice against Enterobacte- riaceae, and were the most ideal antimicrobial agents for serious nosocomial infection.
机构地区 卫生部北京医院
出处 《临床药物治疗杂志》 2003年第4期53-56,共4页 Clinical Medication Journal
关键词 舒巴坦 拉氧头孢 产酶菌 抗菌活性 Β内酰胺酶 生物制品 latamoxef sulbactam β lactamase in vitro antibacterial activity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]卫生部医政司.全国临床检验操作规程.第2版.南京:东南大学出版社,1997,472~531
  • 2[2]National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; ninth informational supplement (M100- S9). NCCLS, 1999, Wayne, Pennsylvania
  • 3[3]Thomson KS, Sanders CC. Detection of extended - spectrum β - lactamases in members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: comparison of the double- disk and three -dimensional test. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1992, 36:1887
  • 4[4]Livermore, D. M. 1995. 3 -Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:557 ~587
  • 5管希周,刘又宁,王睿.临床产ESBLs细菌耐药特性及其基因分型的研究[J].中国抗生素杂志,2001,26(6):468-472. 被引量:34
  • 6陈勇川,刘松青,钱元恕.美洛培南等抗生素对超广谱β-内酰胺酶的稳定性及抑酶效应研究[J].中国抗生素杂志,2000,25(3):204-206. 被引量:16

二级参考文献6

共引文献49

同被引文献26

  • 1张凤凯,李家泰,潘石,郝凤兰,陈杨.拉氧头孢对临床分离的1143株致病菌体外抗菌作用的研究[J].中国抗生素杂志,1994,19(3):221-229. 被引量:6
  • 2金汉珍,主编.实用新生儿学.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.
  • 3Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Di lution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Glow Aerobically [S]. Approved Standard Eighth Edition, 2009, M07-A8.
  • 4Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for An- timicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria[S]. Approved Standard-Seventh Edition, 2007, M1 l-A7.
  • 5Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing[S]. Twenty-Second Informational Supplement, 2012, M100-S22.
  • 6Jones RN, Barry AL, Packer RR, et al. In vitro antimicrobi- al spectrum, accurrence of synergy, and recommendations for dilution susceptibility testing concentration of the cefopera- zone-sulbactam combination[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1987,25 (9): 1725-1729.
  • 7P6rez-P6rez F J, Hanson ND. Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multi- plex PCR[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2002, 40(6): 2153 -2162.
  • 8Snepar R, Poporad G, Romano J, et al. In vitro activity, ef- ficacy, and pharmacology of moxalactam, a new beta-lactam antibiotic[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother , 1981,20 (5) : 642-647.
  • 9Reimer LG, Mirrett S, Reller LB. Comparison of in vitro ac- tivity of moxalactam (LY127935) with cefazolin, amikacin, tobramycin, carbenicillin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin against 420 blood culture isolates[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemoth er, 1980, 17 (3):412-416.
  • 10Lang SD, Edwards DJ, Durack DT. Comparison of cefopera- zone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam (LY127935) against aero- bic gram-negative bacilli[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1980, 17 (3) :488-493.

引证文献3

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部