大陆法系民事诉讼证明标准之理论基础研究

Standard of Proof of Civil Procedure in Continental Law

自由心证主义取代法定证据主义确立了主观确信的理论,主观确信理论在发现实体真实方面具有无可比拟的优势,一经创立很快为大陆法系国家所接受和采纳。但其诞生之初就存在着事实认定的标准究竟应依主观的确信,还是应依客观的盖然性的激烈论争。本文着重从德日两国的判例以及相关基础理论加以介绍,力图全面系统地展示大陆法系在证明标准问题上不同的立场和观点。为我国在该领域的研究提供充分的素材与研究的范式。

The replacement of lawful-evidence principle by free-belief principle brought about the subjective-belief theory. This theory had unequaled advantages in accessing the substantial truth, and was soon accepted and adopted in the countries of Continental Law. But since its birth, there have been vehement controversies about the standard of balance: subjective belief or objective probability. This thesis focuses on some precedent cases in Germany and Japan and relevant theoretical basis, as an attempt to introducing the various viewpoints and perspectives on the proof standard of continental law system, and to provide a model as well as material for researches in this domain in China.