论反垄断诉讼的公益性

On the Public-interested Characteristic of Antimonopoly Proceedings

一般而言,西方反垄断诉讼的程序价值凸显的是维护公益的理念,以期依靠国家的力量重塑被垄断戕害的自由、民主、公平的市场竞争机制。美国政府起诉微软就是着眼于美国整体利益,通过一套以政府与个人为控诉主体的严密、理性的反垄断诉讼机制,提升美国在全球的竞争优势。但是由于中国传统民事诉讼、行政诉讼、刑事自诉裁判理念的私益性和程序规则的局限性,单纯依靠我国现有三大诉讼试图对类似美国微软垄断案的公益经济案件予以解决,显得力不从心。因此,必须强化和贯彻反垄断诉讼中的公益理念。

Generally speaking, the value of western antimonopoly proceedings is to support public interest, and to rebuild freedom, democracy and fairly marketing competition mechanism harmed by monopoly depending on the power of nation. Indicting Microsoft by the government of the United States is to fix attention on the whole national benefits, and to promote the competition advantage of the United States in the world by prudential, reasonable antimonopoly proceedings mechanism for regarding government and individual as suing. But because of the limitation of China traditional civil proceedings, administrative proceedings and criminal proceedings, it seems to be unable to deal with such public economy cases as Microsoft lawsuit only depending on our current proceedings. Therefore, we must enhance and carry out the public interest principle in antimonopoly proceedings.