期刊文献+

《红楼梦》是所谓的“史书”吗?——评霍氏姐弟的《红楼解梦》

Is Dream of the Red Chamber a so-called Historical Record?--Review on Huos' Interpretation on Dream of the Red Chamber
下载PDF
导出
摘要 霍氏姐弟的《红楼解梦》前些年轰动一时 ,其最根本的观点是 :《红楼梦》隐写了“一部历史” ,实质上是“一部史书”。霍氏姐弟赖以立论的 ,主要有四大概念———“野史”、“史公”、“《春秋》微词”和“史家曲笔” ,但是他们根本漠视这些概念的文学意蕴 ,对其做了错误的理解。因此 ,《红楼解梦》建立在这些错误理解上的观点是站不住脚的。 Huos' Interpretation on Dream of the Red Chamber made a noise in the world in the past few years. Their basic view is:Dream of the Red Chamber tells implicitly a history and thus is a historical record.Their view is based on four concepts: unofficial history,historiographer, bias words in the Spring and Autumn Annals, and historian's distortion of the facts. However, they totally have a disregard for the literary implication of these concepts and make improper understanding of these concepts. Therefore, built on these false interpretations, their view is untenable.
作者 胡明清
机构地区 渝西学院中文系
出处 《渝西学院学报(社会科学版)》 2003年第1期42-47,共6页
关键词 《红楼解梦》 “史书” 文学意蕴 “野史” “史公” 曲笔 unofficial history historiographer bias words, historian's distortion of the facts
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1鲁迅 撰郭豫适 导读中国小说史略[M].

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部