期刊文献+

整块盆腔淋巴结清扫术在腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除中的应用(附40例报道) 被引量:2

Application of en-bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic radical cystectomy(report of 40 cases)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术中整块盆腔淋巴结清扫的手术方法和临床价值。方法:回顾性分析2013年2月~2015年2月行腹腔镜下根治性膀胱切除和改良后的整块盆腔淋巴结清扫术40例膀胱癌患者的临床病理资料。40例均为男性,年龄31~80岁,平均60.5岁。T1期2例,T2期19例,T3期13例,T4期6例。结果:所有患者都顺利实施了腹腔镜下手术,无中转开放病例。手术时间140~240min,平均185min。术中出血30~600ml,平均183ml,无输血病例。清扫淋巴结8~22枚,平均13.5枚,淋巴结阳性率为20.0%。术后出现淋巴瘘1例,2周后好转,无其他严重并发症发生。结论:腹腔镜下根治性膀胱切除术联合改进后的整块淋巴结清扫术,可有效避免血管损伤,出血少,保证盆腔淋巴结清扫的彻底性。 Objective:To investigate the surgical method and clinical value of en-bloc pelvic lymph node dissec-tion in laparoscopic radical cystectomy.Methods:Clinical and pathological data of 40 patients with bladder cancer un-dergoing laparoscopic radical cystectomy and modified en-bloc pelvic lymph nodes dissection from February 2013 to February 201 5 were analyzed retrospectively.All of the 40 patients were males.The mean age was 60.5 (31-80) years.Two patients were diagnosed as having T1 tumor,1 9 having T2 ,13 having T3 and 6 having T4 .Results:All the 40 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery successfully without any conversion to open procedure.The mean operative time was 185 (140-240)min.The mean blood loss was 183 (30-600)mL with no blood transfusion during surgery.Average 13.5 lymph nodes,ranging from 8 to 22,were removed during the operation with lymph node positive rate of 20.0%.One patient got postoperative lymphatic fistula and recovered in 2 weeks.There were no other serious perioperative complications. Conclusions:Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with modified en-bloc lymph node resection can reduce the risk of vas-cular injury and bleeding during the operation,and ensure the thoroughness of pelvic lymph node dissection.
出处 《微创泌尿外科杂志》 2015年第3期159-162,共4页 Journal of Minimally Invasive Urology
关键词 膀胱癌 腹腔镜 淋巴结清扫 bladder cancer laparoscopic en-bloc lymphadenectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Ather M Hammad,Alam Zaheer,Jamshaid Anila,Siddiqui Khurram M,Sulaiman M Nasir.Separate submission of standard lymphadenectomy in 6 packets versus en bloc lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer. Urology journal . 2008
  • 2BERNARD H. BOCHNER,HARRY W. HERR,VICTOR E. REUTER.IMPACT OF SEPARATE VERSUS EN BLOC PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION ON THE NUMBER OF LYMPH NODES RETRIEVED IN CYSTECTOMY SPECIMENS[J]. The Journal of Urology . 2001 (6)
  • 3Zehnder P,Moltzahn F,Mitra AP,et al.Radical cystectomy with super-extended lymphadenectomy:Impact of separate versus en bloc lymph node submission on analysis and outcomes. BJU International . 2014
  • 4徐克龙,李炯明,刘建和,陈戬,姜永明,张劲松,闫永吉,王光.预先结扎髂内动脉分支在腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术中的临床研究(附26例报告)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2013,28(5):371-372. 被引量:10
  • 5MOHAMED ABDEL-LATIF,HASSAN ABOL-ENEIN,MAHMOUD EL-BAZ,MOHAMED A. GHONEIM.NODAL INVOLVEMENT IN BLADDER CANCER CASES TREATED WITH RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: INCIDENCE AND PROGNOSIS[J]. The Journal of Urology . 2004 (1)
  • 6John P. Stein,David F. Penson,Jie Cai,Gus Miranda,Eila C. Skinner,Matt A. Dunn,Susan Groshen,Gary Lieskovsky,Donald G. Skinner.Radical Cystectomy With Extended Lymphadenectomy: Evaluating Separate Package Versus en Bloc Submission for Node Positive Bladder Cancer[J]. The Journal of Urology . 2007 (3)
  • 7John P. Stein MD.The role of lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer[J]. Current Oncology Reports . 2007 (3)
  • 8J. Alfred Witjes,Eva Compérat,Nigel C. Cowan,Maria De Santis,Georgios Gakis,Thierry Lebret,Maria J. Ribal,Antoine G. Van der Heijden,Amir Sherif.EAU Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2013 Guidelines[J]. European Urology . 2013
  • 9符伟军,史建国,蔡伟,陈光富,徐阿祥,宋涛,董隽,马鑫,李宏召,张磊,高江平,张旭.腹腔镜下侵袭性膀胱癌盆腔淋巴结清扫的应用解剖及手术技巧[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2014,35(2):102-106. 被引量:8

二级参考文献17

  • 1黄健,许可慰.腹腔镜膀胱全切除-下尿路重建术[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(8):484-486. 被引量:13
  • 2王中凡,苗振立,杜明.双侧髂内动脉结扎在宫颈癌根治术中的临床应用研究[J].华西医学,2006,21(1):104-105. 被引量:3
  • 3石景森,任予.如何应对直肠癌根治术中的骶前大出血[J].中华消化外科杂志,2007,6(5):394-395. 被引量:15
  • 4Basillote J B, Abdelshehid C, Ahlering T E ,et al.Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy with ileal neo-bladder: a comparison with the open approach [J]. JUrol, 2004, 172: 489 — 493.
  • 5Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1054 patients [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19: 666-675.
  • 6Brunocilla E, Pernetti R, Martorana G. The role of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer [ J ]. Anticancer Res, 2011, 31: 271-275.
  • 7Khan MS, Challacombe B, Elhage O, et al. A dual-centre, co- hort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy [ J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2012, 66: 656-662.
  • 8Challacombe B J, Bochner BIt, Dasgupta P, et al. The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of mus- cle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer con-trol and complications [J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 60: 767-775.
  • 9Vazina A, Dugi D, Shariat SF, et al. Stage specific lymph node metastasis mapping in radical cystectomy specimens [ J]. J Urol, 2004, 171: 1830-1834.
  • 10Dorin RP, Daneshmand S, Eisenherg MS, et al. Lymph node dissection technique is more important than lymph node count in identifying nodal metastases in radical cystcetomy patients: a comparative mapping study [J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 60: 946-952.

共引文献16

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部