期刊文献+

PI-RADS评分与1~2针穿刺阳性前列腺癌患者高危病理的相关性研究 被引量:2

Correlation between PI-RADS score and high-risk pathological results of the prostate cancer with 1-2 needles biopsy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析前列腺穿刺阳性针数为1~2针的前列腺癌患者行根治手术后前列腺标本的病理结果,评估前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)评分与根治术后高危病理结果的相关性。方法:回顾2007-2017年北京医院接受MRI检查后前列腺穿刺阳性针数1~2针且接受根治手术的的前列腺癌患者的临床资料,分析患者标本的病理危险度,评估PI-RADS评分与根治术后高危病理结果,Gleason评分改变或分期改变的相关性。进一步分析该组患者中术前评估为低危的患者病理结果出现高危的比例并讨论PI-RADS与其相关性。结果:99例患者中,根治术后高危病理类型患者49例(49.5%)。其中病理分期在T2c及以上的患者共39例(39.4%),根治术后标本Gleason评分≥8分的患者11例(11.1%),切缘阳性患者17例(17.2%)。进一步分析显示在所有患者中含低危患者46例,其中16例(34.8%)患者根治术后出现高危病理类型,PI-RADS评分是该类患者出现根治术后高危病理类型的独立危险因素(P=0.014,OR=3.092,95%CI=1.257~7.606)。99例患者中,有65例(65.7%)患者术后Gleason评分或分期较术前升高,PI-RADS(P=0.043)评分可作为其独立危险因素。结论:穿刺阳性针数为1~2针的前列腺癌患者,根治手术术后病理有一定程度的Gleason评分上升或分期上升,且危险程度在一定程度上被低估,术前PIRADS评分可以作为患者术后出现高危病理类型和分期升高的独立危险因素。 Objective:To analyze the pathological results of prostate specimens in patients with prostate cancer accepting the MRI,who had surgery with 1-2 needles of positive prostate biopsy,and to evaluate the correlation between PI-RADS score and pathological results.Methods:A retrospective analysis was done on prostate cancer patients from 2007 to 2017 in Beijing Hospital who had 1-2 positive biopsy needles after MRI and accepted the radical prostatectomy.The pathological risk of specimens was analyzed,and PI-RADS score and the pathological results,include high-risk pathological factors and upgrade/upstage of the radical surgery specimens,were evaluated.The proportion of patients who were preoperatively assessed as low risk and finally had the high-risk pathological results after radical surgery was further analyzed.The correlation between PI-RADS score and the pathological results was also analyzed.Results:Among the 99 patients,49(49.5%)were of high-risk pathological types after radical prostatectomy.There were 39(39.4%)patients who had pathological staging in T2 c and more,11(11.1%)patients obtained Gleason score over 8 and 17(17.2%)patients had the positive margin.Among all patients,there were 46 patients with low-risk pathological results,among whom 16(34.8%)patients had postoperative high-risk pathological types.PIRADS score was an independent risk factor for patients with low-risk pathological results who had postoperative high-risk pathological types(P=0.014,OR=3.092,95%CI=1.257-7.606).Among the 99 patients,65(65.7%)had upgrade or/and upstage after radical surgery,and pi-rads(P=0.043)score could be used as an independent risk factor.Conclusion:For the prostate cancer patients with 1-2 needles positive needles biopsy after radical prostatectomy,there is a certain upgrade or upstage in pathology and underestimate of the high risk.Preoperative MRI PIRADS score can be used as an independent risk factor for patients with postoperative high-risk pathological types and increased grade or stage.
作者 侯惠民 刘明 程万里 张伟 郭潇潇 张大磊 王建业 HOU Huimin;LIU Ming;CHENG Wanli;ZHANG Wei;GUO Xiaoxiao;ZHANG Dalei;WANG Jianye(Beijing Hospital,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《微创泌尿外科杂志》 2019年第2期128-133,共6页 Journal of Minimally Invasive Urology
基金 国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0840102)
关键词 前列腺癌 PI-RADS评分 高危病理 PI-RADS scores high-risk pathological results
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1严维刚,李汉忠,周毅,纪志刚,张慧,肖雨,刘彤华.超声引导下经会阴定位模板的前列腺饱和穿刺活检[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(6):400-403. 被引量:14
  • 2Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA CancerJ Clin 2015; 65: 5-29.
  • 3Epstein JI, Feng Z, Trock B J, Pierorazio PM. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 1019-24.
  • 4Hong SK, Han BK, Lee ST, Kim SS, Min KE, et al. Prediction of Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancers diagnosed via multi (> or=12)-core prostate biopsy. World J Urol 2009; 27:271-6.
  • 5Gershman B, Dahl DM, Olumi AF, Young RH, McDougal WS, etal. Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading. Urol Oncol 2013; 31: 1033-7.
  • 6Teloken C, Da RC, Caraver F, Weber FA, Cavalheiro AP, et al. Low serum testosterone levels are associated with positive surgical margins in radical retropubic prostatectomy: hypogonadism represents bad prognosis in prostate cancer. J Urol 2005; 174: 2178-80.
  • 7Sooriakumaran P, Srivastava A, Christos P, Grover S, Shevchuk M, et al. Predictive models for worsening prognosis in potential candidates for active surveillance of presumed low-risk prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 2012; 44: 459-70.
  • 8Colleselli D, Pelzer AE, Steiner E, Ongarello S, Schaefer G, et al. Upgrading of Gleasen score 6 prostate cancers on biopsy after prostatectomy in the low and intermediate tPSA range. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2010; 13: 182-5.
  • 9Moreira LK, Camara-Lopes LH, Dall'Oglio MF, Cury J, Antunes AA, etal. Upgrading the Gleason score in extended prostate biopsy: implications for treatment choice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 73: 353-6.
  • 10Chun FK, Steuber T, Erbersdobler A, Currlin E, Walz J, et al. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 820-6.

共引文献35

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部