“法庭之友”参与WTO争端解决程序历史考察述评

The New Dynamic of EU Police Cooperation and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters and Its Implications for China——on Angle of European Public Prosecution

考察"法庭之友"参与WTO争端解决程序的历史可以发现,上诉机构为专家组和其自身接受"法庭之友"意见书提供了法律依据,但这些法律依据并非无懈可击,"法庭之友"参与WTO争端解决程序会引发一系列的问题。即便如此,WTO为了得到国际社会的广泛认可,在未来可能将继续接受"法庭之友"意见书。中国对此应采取何种立场,并如何培育国内"法庭之友"的力量,将是我们需要思考的问题。

Treaty of Lisbon expressly provides for the European Public Prosecutor’s Office(EPPO) in the related chapters of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.Changes in European Public Prosecution is a miniature of EU police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters,and the establishment of the EPPO is one of the initial results of the cooperation.EPPO promotes the EU judicial cooperation,which also affects the future direction of the EPPO in turn.EU police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters tends to be more supranational nature from the specific design and development.The enlightenment of EPPO,EU police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters is that;in order to make it be the rule of law,science and unity,domestic legislation must be amended;in cooperation with other countries and the European Union,the balance between protecting national interests and cooperation must be achieved so as to improve the coordination model,create a regional system with integrated thinking.