期刊文献+

欧盟国际投资仲裁财政责任划分条例评析 被引量:1

Commentary on the Regulation on Apportionment of Financial Responsibility Linked to Investor-State Dispute Settlements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 欧盟国际投资仲裁财政责任划分条例对欧盟及其成员国参与的仲裁案件所涉及的财政责任分配、争端处理、案件和解以及裁决与和解协议的赔偿作了详细的规定。"条例"既为欧盟及成员国参与投资仲裁,承担财政责任提供了明确而清晰的法律框架,同时也体现出欧盟想要在外国投资领域确立完全的排他性管辖权的勃勃野心。但是该"条例"并非尽善尽美,在其与有关国际责任的国际法的一致性、成员国作为应诉方的案件和解、欧盟及其成员国共同作为应诉方的责任承担以及欧盟及其成员国管辖权划分等一些问题上仍有待进一步完善。在中欧双边投资协定谈判和未来的自由贸易区协定谈判中,我国也应当借鉴欧盟签署的协定中的相关规定,就投资仲裁应诉方的确定作出相应安排,并明确欧盟及其成员国在投资仲裁中的共同的和连带的责任,最后也可以通过相应的例外条款设计保证ICSID仲裁的功用得到充分发挥。 The Regulation establishing framework for managing financial responsibility linked to investor-state dispute settlement tribunals established by international agreements to which the European Union is a party sets outs detailed provisions for the apportionment of financial responsibility,conducts of disputes,settlements of disputes,as well as the payment.The Regulation provides a clear framework for the allocations of financial responsibility between the European Union and its Member States,while demonstrates the ambition of the European Commission to acquire fully exclusive competence on foreign investment.However,such Regulation is not as sufficient as its inconsistencies with international responsibility rules and its silence on the settlements of disputes where the Member States are respondents and the allocations of financial responsibility where the EU and the Member States are the respondents.Furthermore,it would have some adverse effects on the distributions of competence between EU and the Member States.In the bilateral investment treaty negotiation and future free trade agreement negotiation with EU,China needs to make comprehensive arrangements with respect to the financial responsibility by referring to EU’s practice.The joint and several responsibilities need to be assumed.Also,exception clauses should be established to make ICSID arbitration a viable mechanism.
作者 张生
出处 《武大国际法评论》 CSSCI 2015年第2期250-266,共17页 Wuhan University International Law Review
基金 国家社科基金青年项目“TPP投资协议中的争端解决机制研究”(14CFX052) 中国博士后第55批面上资助项目“中美投资条约谈判中的市场准入问题研究”(2014M552421) 陕西省博士后基金资助项目“构建‘丝绸之路经济带共同投资协定’研究”等项目的阶段性研究成果
关键词 财政责任 投资争端解决 外国直接投资 共同投资协定 共同的和连带的责任 financial responsibility investment dispute settlement foreign direct investment common investment policy joint and several responsibilities
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1European Court of Justice,Commission of the European Communities v.Republic of Austria. [2009] ECR I-1301 . 2009
  • 2European Commission.Report on the Operation of the Treaty on European Union. SEC (95)731final . 1995
  • 3C.Tietje et al.Responsibility in Investor-State-Arbitration in the EU—Managing Financial Responsibility Linked to Investor-State Dispute Settlement Tribunals Established By EU’’s International Investment Agreements. EXPO/B/INTA/FWC/2009-01/Lot 7/31 . 2012
  • 4'Procedure where there is no agreement as to financial responsibility'. .
  • 5Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for Managing Financial Responsibility Linked to Investor-state Dispute Settlement Tribunals Established by International Agreements to which the European Unio. COM (2012)335 final . 2012
  • 6Wenhua Shan,Sheng Zhang.Market Access Provisions in the Potential EU Model BIT:Toward a'Global BIT 2.0'. Journal of World Investment and Trade . 2014
  • 7Wenhua Shan,Sheng Zhang.the Potential EU-China BIT:Issues and Implications. EU and Investment Agreements:Open Questions and Remaining Challenges . 2013
  • 8Council of the European Union,15375/06. . 2006
  • 9Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union. http://european-convention.eu.int/pdf/LKNEN.pdf . 2001
  • 10European Parliament Resolution of 6 April 2011 on the Future European International Investment Policy. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getD oc.do?type=TA&reference=P7-TA-2011-0141&language=EN . 2011

二级参考文献28

  • 1曾令良.欧共体及其成员国在WTO中的双重地位及其对中国的影响[J].法学评论,1999,17(2):38-45. 被引量:17
  • 2Nicllolas Emiliou and David O' Keeffe (eds.), The European Union and World Trade Law, John Wiley & Sons Publishers,1996, p. 265.
  • 3Opinion pursuant to Art. 228(6)of the EC Treaty, (1994)ECR 1 - 5267.
  • 4Thomas Cottier, Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization : Characteristics and Structural Implications for Ihe European Union, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 35(1998), pp. 325 - 378.
  • 5Nicholas Emiliou and David O'Keefe(eds.), The European Union and World Trade Law, John Wiley & Sons Publisher, L996,pp. 265 -266.
  • 6John H. Jackson, The World Trade System - Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1989, pp. 85 - 88.
  • 7Nicholas Emiliou and David O' Keefe(eds. ), super note 10, p. 271.
  • 8Petersmann, International and European Foreign Trade kaw: GATT Dispute Settlement Proceedings against the EEC, Common Market Law Review , Vol. 22 (1985), pp. 441 - 487.
  • 9EU Activities with the WTO - Report to the European Parliament, working document of the Commission service, Brussels, 1999. pp. 7 - 9.
  • 10Mauricio and John H·Jackson, Procedural Overview of the WTO EC - Banana Dispute, Journal of International Economic Law, 2000, pp. 145 - 166.

共引文献28

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部