摘要
国际投资法的"混合"性质使投资条约仲裁迈向程序透明。国际贸易法委员会投资仲裁透明度规则确立了尊重国家主权、商事仲裁区别于投资仲裁、利益平衡理念下的自由裁量以及投资仲裁透明例外等基本原则。在秉承投资仲裁透明的理念下,透明度规则构建了从仲裁开始至裁决发布等整个投资仲裁程序的透明度义务。这是国际组织协调并促进国际投资法发展的重要成果,但也存有不足。中国必须采取谨慎措施应对投资仲裁透明度的发展趋势。
The hybrid character of international investment law makes investment arbitration transparent more transparency.The UNCITRAL’s Transparency Rule establishes fundamental principles including respecting state sovereignty,differentiating investment arbitration from commercial arbitration discretion under benefit balance and transparency exceptions.In accordance with the concept of transparency of investment arbitration,Transparency Rule imposes the transparency obligations on investment arbitration procedure from the beginning the arbitration the to the publication of the award All in all,it is an important achievement in the process of harmonizing and promoting the development of international investment law by IOs.Meanwhile,there are some drawbacks.China must take care of this new trend about transparency.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
2017年第1期119-137,共19页
Wuhan University International Law Review
基金
国家社科基金研究一般项目(项目号:15BFX203)
江苏高校区域法治发展协同创新中心重点课题(项目号:QYFZFZ201505)
江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目(项目号:2015SJB530)的阶段性研究成果