摘要
国际体育仲裁院作为专门的体育争端裁决机构,通过国际奥委会及单项体育组织的章程及运动员协议,获得了对体育争端的强制管辖权。晚近,也逐渐获得了体育组织、运动员以及各国法院的广泛认可。2015年1月,德国慕尼黑地方高等法院对德国速度滑冰运动员佩希施泰因案作出裁决(以下简称"慕尼黑裁决"),裁决内容挑战了国际体育仲裁院的权威地位,对体育仲裁院管辖权的合法性和合理性造成了一定的冲击。面对体育争端当事方对争端解决独立性、公平性的更高诉求,国际体育仲裁院须进一步推进改革,提升独立性,摆脱滥用垄断地位的嫌疑,维护其管辖权。
CAS is the particular arbitration court for sport disputes,which has the compulsory jurisdiction to parties by charters of IOC,IFS or agreements.Lately,it has been popular within sports organizations,athletes and national courts.In January 2015,Oberlandesgericht Munich made the decision for the case of Ms.Pechstein was called'Munich Award'.Munich award challenged the authority of CAS,and impacted legitimacy and rationality of CAS.In pursue of higher and more fairness and independence of resolving sports disputes,CAS has to promote developments in enhancing independence,dispensing of monopoly over sports disputes to maintain its jurisdiction.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
2017年第1期138-152,共15页
Wuhan University International Law Review
基金
福建省高校新世纪人才支持计划阶段性研究成果