期刊文献+

国际投资仲裁程序规则中的缔约国条约解释机制研究 被引量:6

State Parties' Treaty Interpretation Mechanism in Procedural Rules of International Investment Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际投资条约缔约国可以通过非争端方参与或共同作出联合声明两种路径在投资者与国家仲裁过程中对条约约文进行解释。缔约国条约机制限缩了仲裁庭行使条约解释权的空间范围。全体缔约国根据国际投资条约作出的联合解释独立于《维也纳条约法公约》中的条约解释习惯法,而非争端缔约方的单方解释则可能构成《维也纳条约法公约》第31(3)条的条约解释要素。缔约国依据国际投资条约在仲裁过程中共同解释约文的行为并不违反仲裁正当程序原则,也并未对投资者权利造成损害。缔约国条约解释机制是投资者与国家间仲裁中限缩仲裁庭自由裁量空间的有效方式,应当在缔约与仲裁实践中得到更为广泛的应用。 Parties of international investment treaty may interpret the treaty's articles during the process of investor-State arbitration through ways of non-disputing party participation and making joint statement collectively. The State parties' treaty interpretation mechanism restricts and narrows the space in which arbitral tribunals' may exercise their interpretation power. The joint interpretation made by all treaty parties is independent from the customary rule of treaty interpretation in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaty,while the unilateral interpretation made by a non-disputing party may constitute elements of treaty interpretation in Article 31( 3)of Vienna Convention. Interpreting international investment treaties does not violate the due process of arbitration and does not infringe rights of investors. The State parties' treaty interpretation mechanism which limits the discretion of arbitral tribunals effectively should be applied more extensively in the practice of treaty conclusion and arbitration.
作者 靳也
机构地区 清华大学法学院
出处 《武大国际法评论》 2017年第5期87-99,共13页 Wuhan University International Law Review
关键词 国际投资仲裁 国际投资条约 条约解释 缔约国 international investment arbitration international investment treaty treaty interpretation state party
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献96

  • 1John Bellhouse, Anthony Layers. The Modem Amicus Curiae: A Role in Arbitration [ J ]. CIV. JUST. Q., 2004 (23).
  • 2解决商事争议投资人与国家之间以条约为基础的仲裁的透明度各国政府的评议汇编[R].联合国国际贸易法委员会第二工作组(仲裁和协调),第五十三届会议2010年10月4日至8日,维也纳.
  • 3Lucas Bastin. The Amicus Curiae in Investor-state Arbi- tration[ J ]. Cardozo Journal of International and Com- parative Law, 2012, 1(3).
  • 4Asha Kaushal. Reconciling the Public Interest: Third- Party Participation, Confidentiality and Privacy in NAF- TA Chapter 11 Arbitrations [ J ]. Int. A. L. R. 2006, 9 (6).
  • 5Dr Loukas A. Mistelis. Confidentiality and Third-party Participation UPS Canada and Methanex v United States [ J ]. International Investment Law and Arbitration ( Todd Weiler ed. , Cameron May, London, 2005).
  • 6Eugenia Levine. Amiens Curiae in International Invest- ment Arbitration: The Implications of an Increase in Third- Party Participation[J]. Berkeley Journal of lnter- national Law, 2011 (29).
  • 7《国际投资争议解决中心(投资争议解决中心)的评议》[R].联合国国际贸易法委员会,第二工作组(仲裁和调解)第五十五届会议2011年10月3日至7日,维也纳.
  • 8Katia Faeh G6mez. Rethinking the Role of Amicus Curi- ae in International Investment Arbitration: How to Draw the Line Favorably for the Public Interest [ J ]. Fordham International Law Journal, 2012(35 ).
  • 9Recent Development in Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) [EB/OL]. UNCTAD[2013 -04 -01 ]. http://// unctad, org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdiaepcb2014d3 _ en. pdf.
  • 10Union of International Associations. Yearbook oflnterna- tional Organizations ( 50th edition) ( 2013/2014 ) [ EB/ OL]. www. uia. org.

共引文献41

引证文献6

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部