期刊文献+

第三方资助国际仲裁的披露义务规则研究 被引量:9

Research on the Rules of Disclosure Duty of Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 第三方资助国际仲裁的兴起,对仲裁员的公正性与独立性、仲裁的保密性等问题产生了诸多影响。披露是解决这些问题的关键所在。但涉及第三方资助国际仲裁披露的现行规则,存在效力模糊、灵活度不高以及定义僵化等问题,在实践中不利于当事人引用以保障自身权益。因此,我国在实践中有必要对第三方资助仲裁这一问题进行准确界定,并要求相关当事人承担一定的披露义务,确保第三方资本介入仲裁程序时,依然能够保证仲裁程序的公正性和高效性。 The rise of third-party funding of international arbitration has had a number of impacts on the impartiality and independence of arbitrators and the confidentiality of arbitration.Disclosure is the key issue to resolve these problems.However,in the current rules relating to the disclosure of third-party funding in international arbitration,there are some problems such as ambiguity,low flexibility and rigid definition.In practice,it is not conducive to the party’s citation to protect their rights and interests.Therefore,it is necessary for China to accurately define the issue of third-party funding arrangements in international arbitration,and require relevant parties to bear certain disclosure obligations to ensure that third-party capital can still guarantee the natural characteristics of impartiality and efficiency of the arbitration process.
作者 张亮 杨子希 ZHANG Liang;YANG Zixi
机构地区 中山大学法学院
出处 《武大国际法评论》 CSSCI 2019年第2期105-125,共21页 Wuhan University International Law Review
关键词 国际仲裁 第三方资助 披露义务 披露规则 International arbitration Third-Party funding Disclosure Disclosure rules
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献111

  • 1Stephen J.Toope.Mixed International Arbitration[M].London:Grotuus Publications Limited,1990:389.
  • 2Henri C.Alvarez.Arbitration under the North American Free Trade Agreement[J].Arbitration International,Vol.16,2000:393-94.
  • 3OECD Investment Committee.Transparency and Third Party Participation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement Procedures[EB/OL].[2010-11-15].http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/3/34786913.pdf.
  • 4蔡从燕.国际投资结构变迁与发展中国家双边投资条约实践的发展[G] //陈安.国际经济法学刊.北京:北京大学出版社,2007,14(3):34-55.
  • 5Thomas W.W(a)lde.New Aspects of International Investment Law[M].The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2006:66.
  • 6Bjφm Kunoy.Developments in Indirect Expropria tion Case Law in ICSID Transnational Arbitration[J].Journal of World Investment & Trade,Vol.6,No.3,2005:472.
  • 7Charles H.Brower II.Investor-State Disputes under NAFTA:The Empire Strikes Back[J].Columbia Journal of Transnational Law,Vol.40,2001:64 -65.
  • 8Jan Paulsson and Ceorgios Petrochilos.Revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules[EB/OL].[2010-09 -20].http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/news/arbrules _report,pdf.
  • 9United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.Report of the Working Group on Arbitration and Conciliation on the Work of Its Forty-eighth Session[EB/OL].[2010-09-25].http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/V08/513/98/PDF/V0851398.pdf? OpenElement.
  • 10United Nations Generally Assembly.United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Report of the Working Group on Arbitration and Conciliation on the Work of Its Forty-eighth Session[EB/OL].[2010-09-24].http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/V08/513/98/PDF/V0851398.pdf? OpenElement.

同被引文献194

引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部