期刊文献+

欧盟贸易救济立法修改述评——以WTO改革为背景 被引量:7

Review on Recent Amendment of EU Trade Remedy Instruments:In the Context of WTO Reform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近两年来,欧盟先后两次对其贸易救济立法进行修改。在WTO改革的大背景下,欧盟贸易救济立法修改后,提出"市场严重扭曲"概念、发布中国市场严重扭曲报告、采用原材料扭曲情形下部分弃用低税规则的做法,有可能对多边贸易规则发展存在重要的潜在影响。近期,欧盟对WTO改革提出了系统性的概念文件,其中既有与贸易救济立法修改一脉相承的理念,也体现了一些差异性。中、欧都是多边贸易体制的支持者,在WTO改革中应密切合作,首先解决争端解决机制的有效性问题,也可以在透明度、补贴通报等领域开展更多合作。在贸易救济领域,中、欧双方存在的分歧可以通过WTO争端解决机制及双边谈判等多途径解决。 In the past two years,the EU has revised its trade remedy instruments twice.In the context of WTO reform,the concept of'significant market distortion',the working document on significant distortions in the economy of China,and the partial abandonment of LDR under the circumstance of raw material restriction may influence the development of international trade law.Recently,the EU have proposed a concept paper on WTO reform.On the one hand,it has some consistent concept with the amendment of trade remedy instruments.On the other hand,it also reflects some differences.Both China and the EU are supporters of the multilateral trading system,so we should cooperate in the WTO reform.The dispute settlement function of the WTO is in grave danger and we should give priority to solve the problem.We could also carry out more cooperation in the areas of transparency and subsidy notifications.The differences between the two members in the trade remedy area can be resolved through multiple ways such as the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and bilateral negotiations.
作者 蒋璇芳 JIANG Xuanfang
出处 《武大国际法评论》 CSSCI 2019年第2期143-157,共15页 Wuhan University International Law Review
关键词 欧盟贸易救济现代化 WTO改革 市场严重扭曲 低税规则 中国市场严重扭曲报告 TDI Modernisation the reform of WTO significant market distortion lesser duty rule report on significant distortions in the economy of China
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献76

  • 1Sodium Glueonate from P.R. China, Official Journal of the European Union, L282, 2010, p. 27.
  • 2Harald Wenig, The European Community's Antidumping System: Salient Features, 39 J. W. T. 792 (2005).
  • 3Edwin Vermulst and Paul Waer, E.C. Antidumping Law and Practice, London: Sweet & Maxwell 1996, p. 844.
  • 4Council Regulation (EC) No. 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on Protection Against Dumped Imports from Coun-tries Not Members of the European Community,简称《384/96条例》.
  • 5Ivo Van Bael and Jean-francois Bellis, Anti-dumping and Other Trade Protection Laws of the EC, Hague, Kluwer Law International 2004, p. 310.
  • 6()pen Mesh Fabrics of Glass Fibres from P.R. China, Official Journal of the European Union, 1.43, 2011, p. 22.
  • 7Coated Fine Paper from P.R. China, Official Journal of the European Union, L299, 2010, p. 27.
  • 8Edwin Vermulst and Paul Waer, E.C. Antidumping Law and Practice, London: Sweet & Maxwell 1996,第359页.
  • 9See Doha Ministerial Declaration, adopted 14 November 2001, WTODocument WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1, para. 28.
  • 10Submissions from the European Communities concerning the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994 (Anti-dumping Agreement), WTO Document TN/RL/W/13, 8 July 2002.

共引文献57

同被引文献47

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部