期刊文献+

度他雄胺治疗良性前列腺增生的预算影响分析 被引量:11

Budget Impact Analysis on Using Dutasteride for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:从全国城镇基本医疗保险的角度出发,评价将度他雄胺纳入"国家医保药品目录"对医保支付方预算的影响,为医疗保险部门提供决策依据。方法:通过构建预算影响分析模型,对目标人群、当前和未来可能的治疗方案组合、药品费用和疾病相关医疗费用进行估计,把度他雄胺纳入"国家医保药品目录"的情境和度他雄胺不纳入的情境相比,分析未来5年(2014—2018年)总预算的变化。结果:两种情境相比,未来5年内医保支付的差值分别为:-232万元、-837万元、-1 930万元、-2 867万元和-3 977万元。结论:将度他雄胺纳入"国家医保药品目录"可能会带来医保总预算的节约。 Objective:To evaluate the budge impact of listing Dutasteride in'National reimbursement drug list(NRDL)' from therespective of National Urban Basic Medical Insurance so as to provide evidence for medical insurance decision maker.Methods:Abudget impact analysis model was constructed to estimate the target population, the current and future treatment combinations, costs ofdrugs and diseaserelated healthcare. The potential scenario(Dutasteride was listed in NRDL) was compared to the reference scenario(Dutasteride was not listed in NRDL). The budget changes in the following 5 years(2014—2018) were analyzed.Results:Compared tothe reference scenario, the net saving in the following 5 years were estimated as2.32 million,8.37 million,19.30 million,28.67 million and39.77 million respectively. Conclusion: Listing Dutesteride in NRDL could lead to general budget saving ofmedical insurance.
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2015年第11期62-65,共4页 Chinese Health Economics
关键词 度他雄胺 良性前列腺增生 预算影响分析 Dutasteride benign prostatic hyperplasia budget impact analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1吴楠.中国城市老年科门诊良性前列腺增生(BPH)症患者诊断治疗现状及就诊意愿研究[D].中南大学2010
  • 2Claus G Roehrborn,Peter Boyle,J.Curtis Nickel,Klaus Hoefner,Gerald Andriole.Efficacy and safety of a dual inhibitor of 5-alpha-reductase types 1 and 2 (dutasteride) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Urology . 2002 (3)
  • 3Michael Blute,Stacey J Ackerman,Alisoh L Rein,Kathleen Beusterien,Erin M Sullivan,Craig P Tanio,Michael J Strauss,Michael J Manyak.Cost effectiveness of microwave thermotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: part II—results[J]. Urology . 2000 (6)
  • 4Fenter Thomas C,Runken M Chris,Black Libby,Eaddy Michael.Finasteride versus dutasteride: a real-world economic evaluation. The American journal of managed care . 2007
  • 5Sciarra Alessandro,Salciccia Stefano,Nesi Gianluca,Cattarino Susanna,Alfarone Andrea,Gentilucci Alessandro,Gentile Vincenzo.Comparative effect of finasteride and dutasteride on chromogranin A levels. Anticancer Research . 2010
  • 6Naslund Michael,Eaddy Michael T,Kruep Eric J,Hogue Susan L.Cost comparison of finasteride and dutasteride for enlarged prostate in a managed care setting among Medicare-aged men. The American journal of managed care . 2008

同被引文献129

引证文献11

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部