期刊文献+

集体创造性写作中学生讨论过程的会话分析

Conversational Analysis of Middle School Students' Collaborative Creative Writing Activities
原文传递
导出
摘要 写作作为创造性的生产活动一直备受人们关注。协作式的写作能够拓展学生的个人视野,使得学生在集体的讨论中,共享自我的知识结构。本研究收集了上海市某中学七年级学生以《梦》为主题的写作任务的集体讨论的视频数据,分析结果显示,学生使用了"探索性对话",呈现出较高的互动性。学生能够通过问答的方式帮助集体明确问题和任务目标,并积极给出自己的想法和建议,通过推理、事实信息的辅助等与他人争论,共同建构出一个生动奇幻的故事。 Writing as a creative production activity has been capturing attention. Collaborative writing can expand students’ personal horizons and enable individual students to share their own knowledge structures in a collective discussion. This study collected the video data of Shanghai seventh graders in a group discussion of the writing task with the theme of 'Dream'. The analysis showed that students used 'exploratory talk' and showed high interactivity. Students can help the group clarify the problems and tasks through asking and answering questions and actively give their own ideas and suggestions. By the means of reasoning and with the aid of factual information, students can argue with others to jointly create a vivid and fantastic story.
作者 吴媛媛 杨向东 WU Yuanyuan;YANG Xiangdong(Shanghai Second Normal School Affiliated Primary School,Shanghai,200092,China;Department of Education Psychology,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062,China;Institute of Curriculum and Instruction,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062,China)
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第2期95-105,共11页 Global Education
基金 2017年国家社会科学基金重大项目"提高基础教育质量的脑科学机制研究"(项目编号:17ZDA323)的阶段性成果
关键词 集体创造性 协作式任务 写作 会话分析 探索性对话 collaborative creativity collaborative tasks writing conversational analysis exploratory talk
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1Case, R., Hayward, S., Lewis, M., & Hurst, P. Toward a neo-Piagetian theory of cognitive and emotion- al development [J]. Developmental Review, 1988, 8 (1): 1-51.
  • 2Cole, M. , & Engestrom, Y. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition [M]//G. Salomon (Ed.). Distributed cognitions.. Psychological and educational considerations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 1993: 47-87.
  • 3Erickson, F. Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales [M]// J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.). Handbook of complementary methods in education research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1992: 177-192.
  • 4Yackel, E. , Cobb, P. , & Wood, T. The interactive constitution of mathematical meaning in one second grade classroom: an illustrative example [J]. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 1998, 17(4) : 469-488.
  • 5John-Steiner, V. , & Mahn, H. Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian frame- work [J]. Educational Psychologist, 1996, 31 (3/4) : 191-206.
  • 6Wenger, E. Communities of practice: Learning, mean ing, and identity [M]. New York, NY: Cambridge uni versity press, 1999.
  • 7Wells, G. Dialogic inquiry in education [M]//C. Lee P. Smagorinsky (Eds.) Vygotskian perspectives on lit- eracy research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 2000: 51-84.
  • 8Putney, Green, Dixon, Duran, & Yeager. Consequential Progressions [M]// C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.) Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 86-126.
  • 9Cazden, C. B. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning [M]. 2nd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2001: 3.
  • 10Erickson, F. Talk and Social Theory: Ecologies of Speaking and Listening in Everyday Life [M]. Maiden, MA: Polity Press, 2004: 110.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部