期刊文献+

澳大利亚科学素养测评框架探析及启示 被引量:5

An Analysis on Australian Science Literacy Assessment Framework and Its Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 澳大利亚"全国科学素养测评项目"自2003年开始运行,评估小学生的科学素养水平。2015年,在国家课程实施的大背景下,科学素养测评基于"主要科学概念"和"科学素养水平进阶图"构建框架,同时关注读写能力、计算能力、ICT以及批判性思维与创造性思维等"通用能力"。测评形式包括目标测试、探究性任务和问卷调查三部分。首次基于计算机的测评在探究任务的设计、题型和情境设计等方面进行了深入探索,创造性地发挥视频资源的巨大潜力。澳大利亚科学素养测评框架对我国构建基于核心概念和核心素养的新一代科学学业质量测评框架和试题具有重要启示。 The National Assessment Program-science literacy Project in Australian has been in operation since 2003 to assess the scientific literacy level of primary school students. In 2015, under the background of the implementation of The Australian Curriculum, the framework of the project is based on ' Major Scientific Concepts ' and ' Science Literacy Progress Map '. At the same time, it pays attention to 'general abilities' such as Literacy, Numeracy, ICT, Critical and creative thinking. The evaluation form includes three parts:objective tests, inquiry task and questionnaire survey. For the first time, computer-based assessment has made in-depth exploration in the design of inquiry tasks,tests and situations, and creatively exploited the huge potential of video resources. Australia’s scientific academic quality assessment framework has important implications for China to build a new generation of scientific academic quality assessment framework and test questions based on key concepts and key competency.
作者 王俊民 WANG Junmin
出处 《外国中小学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期47-56,46,共11页 Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad
基金 2018年重庆市社会科学规划项目博士项目"核心素养视域下重庆市青少年STEM素养测评研究"(项目编号:2018BS92)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 澳大利亚 科学素养 学业质量 测评框架 科学探究 通用能力 NAP Australia scientific literacy academic quality assessment framework scientific inquiry general abilities NAP
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献34

  • 1张雨青,林薇,张霞.学习障碍儿童的基本能力特征[J].心理发展与教育,1995,11(3):59-64. 被引量:15
  • 2钟志贤.促进学习者高阶思维发展的教学设计假设[J].电化教育研究,2004,25(12):21-28. 被引量:240
  • 3徐朔.“关键能力”培养理念在德国的起源和发展[J].外国教育研究,2006,33(6):66-69. 被引量:170
  • 4雷新勇.基于标准的教育考试[M].上海:上海科技出版社,2011.
  • 5中华人民共和国教育部.关于推进中小学教育质量综合评价改革的意见[Z].教基二[2013]2号.
  • 6Downing S M.Twelve steps for effective test development.In Downing S M,Haladyna T M.Handbook of test development[M].Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers,2006:3-25.
  • 7Cizek G J.Standard setting.In Downing S M,Haladyna T M.Handbook of test development[M].Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers,2006:225-258.
  • 8American educational Research Association,American Psychological Association,National Council on Measurement in Education.Standards for educational and psychological testing[M].Washington,DC:AmericanEducational Research Association,1999.
  • 9Bejar Isaac I.Standard setting:What is it?Why is it important[J].Educational testing service,2008,7:20-26.
  • 10Cizek G J.StandardSetting Guidelines[J].Educational Measurement:Issues and Practice,1996,15(1):13-21.

共引文献64

同被引文献44

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部