摘要
四庫全書館修七閣本之間的差别向來受到重视,但閣本與殿本之間的異同尚未引起應有的注意。本文主要論證了四庫全書文淵閣本與武英殿聚珍版本《張燕公集》的增補情况,對其間的編纂年代、提要舛誤、增補篇數、增補來源、增補訛誤等内容進行了辨析,不僅為閣本與殿本的比較提供了重要的個案,同時也對張説文集流傳最廣的兩種版本作出了较為全面的文獻學研究。
This treatise based on the supplement of Si Ku Quan ShuWen Yuan Ge version and Ju Zhen version, distinguishes the similarities and differences of their compilation periods, synopses, supplemented pieces, sources anderrors. In long time, it was the difference between various versions of Si KwQuan Shu but not the difference between this two series of versions was attractedmuch attention. This treatise provides an example and conducts a comprehensiveand systematic research on the two prevalent series of versions of Zhang yue'sworks from the perspective of philology.
出处
《中国典籍与文化论丛》
2002年第1期78-92,共15页
Chinese Classics & Culture Essays Collection
关键词
張説
《張燕公集》
文淵閣本
武英殿聚珍版本
Zhang Yue
Si Ku Quan Shu
Wen Yuan Ge version Ju Zhenversion
The Collected works of Zhang Yan Gong