故意杀人罪死刑限制的一个切入——以于欢案和潘强故意杀人案为例

On Limiting Death Penalty for Intentional Homicide

义愤之下致人死亡的性质认定是司法实践的难点,但也是故意杀人罪死刑限制的一个路径。重新构建国家——被告人——被害人三元结构模式可以有效防止司法机关只重视犯罪结果而忽视被害人过错;将被害人过错酌定情节法定化并区分过错等级,构建罪责刑相适应的刑罚体系。规范民意的输入和表达程序,完善司法机关回应民意的机制,是刑事审判工作的改革方向,也作用于限制故意杀人罪死刑适用。

The nature affirmation of causing death by moral indignation is difficult for judicial practice, but also a way of limiting death penalty for intentional homicide. Reconstructing the ternary mode of the state-the defendant-the victim can effectively prevent the judiciary mistake of only paying attention to the criminal results regardless of the victim's fault. The discretion of victim's fault should be legalized and classified to establish the punishment system adaptive to the principles of criminal responsibility. It is reforming orientation of criminal justice to standardize the inputting and expressing procedure of public opinion and improve the mechanism of the judiciary responding to public opinion, and also applied to limit the death penalty for intentional homicide.