期刊文献+

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and pelvic floor disorders 被引量:6

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and pelvic floor disorders
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Pelvic floor disorders are different dysfunctions of gynaecological, urinary or anorectal organs, which can present as incontinence, outlet-obstruction and organ prolapse or as a combination of these symptoms. Pelvic floor disorders affect a substantial amount of people,predominantly women. Transabdominal procedures play a major role in the treatment of these disorders. With the development of new techniques established open procedures are now increasingly performed lapa-roscopically. Operation techniques consist of various rectopexies with suture, staples or meshes eventually combined with sigmoid resection. The different approaches need to be measured by their operative and functional outcome and their recurrence rates. Although these operations are performed frequently a comparison and evaluation of the different methods is difficult, as most of the used outcome measures in the available studies have not been standardised and data from randomised studies comparing these outcome measures directly are lacking. Therefore evidence based guidelines do not exist. Currently the laparoscopic approach with ventral mesh rectopexy or resection rectopexy is the two most commonly used techniques. Observational and retrospective studies show good functional results, a low rate of complications and a low recurrence rate. As high quality evidence is missing, an individualized approach is recommend for every patient considering age, individual health status and the underlying morphological and functional disorders. Pelvic floor disorders are different dysfunctions of gynaecological, urinary or anorectal organs, which can present as incontinence, outlet-obstruction and organ prolapse or as a combination of these symptoms. Pelvic floor disorders affect a substantial amount of people,predominantly women. Transabdominal procedures play a major role in the treatment of these disorders. With the development of new techniques established open procedures are now increasingly performed lapa-roscopically. Operation techniques consist of various rectopexies with suture, staples or meshes eventually combined with sigmoid resection. The different approaches need to be measured by their operative and functional outcome and their recurrence rates. Although these operations are performed frequently a comparison and evaluation of the different methods is difficult, as most of the used outcome measures in the available studies have not been standardised and data from randomised studies comparing these outcome measures directly are lacking. Therefore evidence based guidelines do not exist. Currently the laparoscopic approach with ventral mesh rectopexy or resection rectopexy is the two most commonly used techniques. Observational and retrospective studies show good functional results, a low rate of complications and a low recurrence rate. As high quality evidence is missing, an individualized approach is recommend for every patient considering age, individual health status and the underlying morphological and functional disorders.
机构地区 Department of Surgery
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy》 CAS 2015年第12期1045-1054,共10页 世界胃肠内镜杂志(英文版)(电子版)
关键词 RESECTION RECTOPEXY PELVIC FLOOR DISORDERS RECTAL Resection rectopexy Pelvic floor disorders Rectal
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1L. Lundby,S. Laurberg.Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: time for a critical appraisal[J]. Colorectal Dis . 2015 (2)
  • 2N. Gouvas,P. A. Georgiou,C. Agalianos,E. Tan,P. Tekkis,C. Dervenis,E. Xynos.Ventral colporectopexy for overt rectal prolapse and obstructed defaecation syndrome: a systematic review[J]. Colorectal Dis . 2015 (2)
  • 3F. Rondelli,W. Bugiantella,F. Villa,A. Sanguinetti,M. Boni,E. Mariani,N. Avenia.Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. International Journal of Surgery . 2014
  • 4C. Foppa,L. Martinek,J. P. Arnaud,R. Bergamaschi.Ten‐year follow up after laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full‐thickness rectal prolapse[J]. Colorectal Dis . 2014 (10)
  • 5Trine Bjerke,Tommie Mynster.Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in an elderly population with external rectal prolapse: clinical and anal manometric results[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease . 2014 (10)
  • 6S. Palit,C. Bhan,P. J. Lunniss,D. J. Boyle,M. A. Gladman,C. H. Knowles,S. M. Scott.Evacuation proctography: a reappraisal of normal variability[J]. Colorectal Dis . 2014 (7)
  • 7H. A. Formijne Jonkers,A. Maya,W. A. Draaisma,W. A. Bemelman,I. A. Broeders,E. C. J. Consten,S. D. Wexner.Laparoscopic resection rectopexy versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse[J]. Techniques in Coloproctology . 2014 (7)
  • 8Mittu Mathew,Amit Parmar,Prasanna Reddy.Mesh erosion after laparoscopic posterior rectopexy: A rare complication[J]. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery . 2014 (1)
  • 9Manash Sahoo,Anil Thimmegowda,Manoj Gowda.A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy[J]. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery . 2014 (1)
  • 10M. S. El Muhtaseb,D. C. C. Bartolo,D. Zayiae,T. Salem.Colonic transit before and after resection rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse[J]. Techniques in Coloproctology . 2014 (3)

共引文献3

同被引文献20

引证文献6

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部