期刊文献+

Barrett's esophagus in 2016: From pathophysiology to treatment 被引量:1

Barrett's esophagus in 2016: From pathophysiology to treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Esophageal complications caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)include reflux esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus(BE).BE is a premalignant condition with an increased risk of developing esophageal adeno-carcinoma(EAC).The carcinogenic sequence may progress through several steps,from normal esophageal mucosa through BE to EAC.A recent advent of functional esophageal testing(particularly multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring)has helped to improve our knowledge about GERD pathophysiology,including its complications.Those findings(when properly confirmed)might help to predict BE neoplastic progression.Over the last few decades,the incidence of EAC has continued to rise in Western populations.However,only a minority of BE patients develop EAC,opening the debate regarding the cost-effectiveness of current screening/surveillance strategies.Thus,major efforts in clinical and research practice are focused on new methods for optimal risk assessment that can stratify BE patients at low or high risk of developing EAC,which should improve the cost effectiveness of screening/surveillance programs and consequently significantly affect health-care costs.Furthermore,the area of BE therapeutic management is rapidly evolving.Endoscopic eradication therapies have been shown to be effective,and new therapeutic options for BE and EAC have emerged.The aim of the present review article is to highlight the status of screening/surveillance programs and the current progress of BE therapy.Moreover,we discuss the recent introduction of novel esophageal pathophysiological exams that have improved the knowledge of the mechanisms linking GERD to BE. Esophageal complications caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)include reflux esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus(BE).BE is a premalignant condition with an increased risk of developing esophageal adeno-carcinoma(EAC).The carcinogenic sequence may progress through several steps,from normal esophageal mucosa through BE to EAC.A recent advent of functional esophageal testing(particularly multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring)has helped to improve our knowledge about GERD pathophysiology,including its complications.Those findings(when properly confirmed)might help to predict BE neoplastic progression.Over the last few decades,the incidence of EAC has continued to rise in Western populations.However,only a minority of BE patients develop EAC,opening the debate regarding the cost-effectiveness of current screening/surveillance strategies.Thus,major efforts in clinical and research practice are focused on new methods for optimal risk assessment that can stratify BE patients at low or high risk of developing EAC,which should improve the cost effectiveness of screening/surveillance programs and consequently significantly affect health-care costs.Furthermore,the area of BE therapeutic management is rapidly evolving.Endoscopic eradication therapies have been shown to be effective,and new therapeutic options for BE and EAC have emerged.The aim of the present review article is to highlight the status of screening/surveillance programs and the current progress of BE therapy.Moreover,we discuss the recent introduction of novel esophageal pathophysiological exams that have improved the knowledge of the mechanisms linking GERD to BE.
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics》 CAS 2016年第2期190-206,共17页 世界胃肠药理与治疗学杂志(英文版)(电子版)
关键词 GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX disease Barrett’s ESOPHAGUS Esophageal ADENOCARCINOMA Impedance and pH monitoring Endoscopy Gastroesophageal reflux disease Barrett's esophagus Esophageal adenocarcinoma Impedance and pH monitoring Endoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献167

  • 1Justin C.Y. Wu,Carrian M.Y. Cheung,Vincent W.S. Wong,Joseph J.Y. Sung.??Distinct Clinical Characteristics Between Patients With Nonerosive Reflux Disease and Those With Reflux Esophagitis(J)Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology . 2007 (6)
  • 2Mari Mino-Kenudson,Mindy J. Hull,Ian Brown,Alona Muzikansky,Amitabh Srivastava,Jonathan Glickman,Do-Youn Park,Lawrence Zuckerberg,Joseph Misdraji,Robert D. Odze,Gregory Y. Lauwers.??EMR for Barrett’s esophagus–related superficial neoplasms offers better diagnostic reproducibility than mucosal biopsy <ce:link locator='fx1'/>(J)Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2007 (4)
  • 3N. B.ROBERTS.??Review article: human pepsins – their multiplicity, function and role in reflux disease(J)Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics . 2006
  • 4U. Strate,A. Emmermann,C. Fibbe,P. Layer,C. Zornig.??Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility(J)Surgical Endoscopy . 2008 (1)
  • 5L. Gossner,O. Pech,A. May,M. Vieth,M. Stolte,C. Ell.??Comparison of methylene blue-directed biopsies and four-quadrant biopsies in the detection of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early cancer in Barrett’s oesophagus(J)Digestive and Liver Disease . 2006 (10)
  • 6M. Frazzoni,M. Manno,E. De Micheli,V. Savarino.Pathophysiological characteristics of the various forms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease[J].Digestive and Liver Disease.2006(9)
  • 7John A. Evans,John M. Poneros,Brett E. Bouma,Jason Bressner,Elkan F. Halpern,Milen Shishkov,Gregory Y. Lauwers,Mari Mino–Kenudson,Norman S. Nishioka,Guillermo J. Tearney.??Optical Coherence Tomography to Identify Intramucosal Carcinoma and High-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett’s Esophagus(J)Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology . 2006 (1)
  • 8Prateek Sharma,Ajay Bansal,Sharad Mathur,Sachin Wani,Rachel Cherian,Douglas McGregor,April Higbee,Sandra Hall,Allan Weston.??The utility of a novel narrow band imaging endoscopy system in patients with Barrett’s esophagus(J)Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2006 (2)
  • 9A. Hoffman,R. Kiesslich,A. Bender,M.F. Neurath,B. Nafe,G. Herrmann,M. Jung.??Acetic acid–guided biopsies after magnifying endoscopy compared with random biopsies in the detection of Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective randomized trial with crossover design <ce:link locator='fx1'/>(J)Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2006 (1)
  • 10Herbert C. Wolfsen,Julia E. Crook,Murli Krishna,Sami R. Achem,Kenneth R. Devault,Ernest P. Bouras,David S. Loeb,Mark E. Stark,Timothy A. Woodward,Lois L. Hemminger,Frances K. Cayer,Michael B. Wallace.??Prospective, Controlled Tandem Endoscopy Study of Narrow Band Imaging for Dysplasia Detection in Barrett’s Esophagus(J)Gastroenterology . 2008 (1)

二级参考文献5

  • 1Savarino E;Pohl D;Zentilin P.Functional heartburn has more in common with functional dyspepsia than with non-erosive reflux disease,2009(09).
  • 2Kahrilas PJ;Dodds WJ;Hogan WJ.Esophageal peristaltic dysfunction in peptic esophagitis,1986(47).
  • 3Spechler SJ,Castell DO.Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut . 2001
  • 4Mark Fox,Carole Barr,Suzanne Nolan,Miranda Lomer,Angela Anggiansah,Terry Wong.The Effects of Dietary Fat and Calorie Density on Esophageal Acid Exposure and Reflux Symptoms[J]. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology . 2007 (4)
  • 5John E. Pandolfino,Hashem B. El–Serag,Qing Zhang,Nimeesh Shah,Sudip K. Ghosh,Peter J. Kahrilas.Obesity: A Challenge to Esophagogastric Junction Integrity[J]. Gastroenterology . 2006 (3)

共引文献56

同被引文献26

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部