摘要
AIM: To compare the utility of the partners-heart failure(HF) algorithm with the care alert strategy for remote monitoring,in guiding clinical actions oriented to treat impending HF.METHODS: Consecutive cardiac resynchronizationdefibrillator recipients were followed with biweekly automatic transmissions. After every transmission,patients received a phone contact in order to check their health status,eventually followed by clinical actions,classified as "no-action","non-active" and "active". Active clinical actions were oriented to treat impending HF. The sensitivity,specificity,positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy of the partners-HF algorithm vs care alert in determining active clinical actions oriented to treat pre-HF status and to prevent an acute decompensation,were also calculated.RESULTS: The study population included 70 patients with moderate to advanced systolic HF and QRS duration longer than 120 ms. During a mean follow-up of 8 ± 2 mo,665 transmissions were collected. No deaths or HF hospitalizations occurred. The sensitivity and specificity of the partners-HF algorithm for active clinical actions oriented to treat impending HF were 96.9%(95%CI: 0.96-0.98) and 92.5%(95%CI: 0.90-0.94) respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 84.6%(95%CI: 0.82-0.87) and 98.6%(95%CI: 0.98-0.99) respectively. The partners-HF algorithm had an accuracy of 93.8%(95%CI: 0.92-0.96) in determining active clinical actions. With regard to active clinical actions,care alert had a sensitivity and specificity of 11.05%(95%CI: 0.09-0.13) and 93.6% respectively(95%CI: 0.92-0.95). The positive predictive value was 42.3%(95%CI: 0.38-0.46); the negative predictive value was 71.1%(95%CI: 0.68-0.74). Care alert had an accuracy of 68.9%(95%CI: 0.65-0.72) in determining active clinical actions.CONCLUSION: The partners-HF algorithm proved higher accuracy and sensitivity than care alert in determining active clinical actions oriented to treat impending HF. Future studies in larger populations should evaluate partners-HF ability to improve HF-related clinical outcomes.
AIM: To compare the utility of the partners-heart failure (HF) algorithm with the care alert strategy for remote monitoring, in guiding clinical actions oriented to treat impending HF.METHODS: Consecutive cardiac resynchronization-defibrillator recipients were followed with biweekly automatic transmissions. After every transmission, patients received a phone contact in order to check their health status, eventually followed by clinical actions, classified as “no-action”, “non-active” and “active”. Active clinical actions were oriented to treat impending HF. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy of the partners-HF algorithm vs care alert in determining active clinical actions oriented to treat pre-HF status and to prevent an acute decompensation, were also calculated.RESULTS: The study population included 70 patients with moderate to advanced systolic HF and QRS duration longer than 120 ms. During a mean follow-up of 8 ± 2 mo, 665 transmissions were collected. No deaths or HF hospitalizations occurred. The sensitivity and specificity of the partners-HF algorithm for active clinical actions oriented to treat impending HF were 96.9% (95%CI: 0.96-0.98) and 92.5% (95%CI: 0.90-0.94) respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 84.6% (95%CI: 0.82-0.87) and 98.6% (95%CI: 0.98-0.99) respectively. The partners-HF algorithm had an accuracy of 93.8% (95%CI: 0.92-0.96) in determining active clinical actions. With regard to active clinical actions, care alert had a sensitivity and specificity of 11.05% (95%CI: 0.09-0.13) and 93.6% respectively (95%CI: 0.92-0.95). The positive predictive value was 42.3% (95%CI: 0.38-0.46); the negative predictive value was 71.1% (95%CI: 0.68-0.74). Care alert had an accuracy of 68.9% (95%CI: 0.65-0.72) in determining active clinical actions.CONCLUSION: The partners-HF algorithm proved higher accuracy and sensitivity than care alert in determining active clinical actions oriented to treat impending HF. Future studies in larger populations should evaluate partners-HF ability to improve HF-related clinical outcomes.
