期刊文献+

机器人辅助直肠癌根治术(附179例报告) 被引量:1

Robotic-assisted radical resection in rectal cancer: a report of 179 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨机器人辅助直肠癌根治术的安全性、可行性及肿瘤根治性。方法:回顾性分析我科自2015年9月至2018年1月,采用达芬奇~机器人手术系统开展直肠癌根治术179例,其中肿块下缘位于腹膜反折以上者100例,以下者79例。结果:179例机器人辅助直肠癌根治术均获成功,共完成保肛手术158例。4例伴肝转移的Ⅳ期病人同时切除肝转移灶。平均手术时间(154±44) min,中位出血量50 mL,平均清扫淋巴结(15.4±5.4)枚。病人术后(4.0±2.1) d开始进食流质,术后平均住院(7.6±3.1) d。发生并发症5例(2.79%),均为吻合口漏,未再次手术。学习曲线分析显示,17例后跨越学习曲线。结论:机器人辅助直肠癌根治术安全可行,创伤小、恢复快,近期疗效好。 Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted rectal cancer radical resection.Methods The clinical data of 179 patients with rectal cancer who underwent robotic-assisted radical resection using da Vinci~ Robotic Surgical System in this hospital from September 2015 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed including 100 cases with the distal margin of tumor above peritoneal reflection and 79 cases below peritoneal reflection.Results All cases had robotic-assisted rectal cancer radical resection successfully. A total of 158 cases had radical resection with anus preservation. Both rectal cancer and hepatic metastasis were resected in 4 cases with stage Ⅳ. Mean operative time was(154±44) minutes and median blood loss was 50 mL with mean harvested lymph nodes of 15.4±5.4. Liquid diet recovered(4.0±2.1) days after operation. Mean hospital stay was(7.6±3.1) days postoperatively. There were 5 cases(2.79%) with surgical complications as anastomotic leak recovered without surgical intervention. Learning curve analysis showed that passing learning curve was 17 cases later. Conclusions It was indicated that robotic-assisted rectal cancer radical resection is feasible and safe combined with minimal invasion and fast recovery.
出处 《外科理论与实践》 2018年第5期413-417,共5页 Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice
关键词 直肠癌 根治术 机器人手术 Rectal cancer Radical resection Robotic surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1郑民华,马君俊.腹腔镜直肠全系膜切除术在中低位直肠癌手术中的应用现状与展望[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(2):99-101. 被引量:53
  • 2Zimmern A,Prasad L,Desouza A,et al. Robotic colon and rectal surgery :a series of 131 cases[ J]. World J Surg,2010,34(8):1954-1958.
  • 3DAnnibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases[ J]. Dis ColonRectum,2004,47(12) :2162-2168.
  • 4Oleynikov D. Robotic surgery. Surg Clin North Am, 2008,88: 1121-1130,viii.
  • 5Pigazzi A, Ellenhom JD, Ballantync GH, et al. Robotic- assisted laparoseopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc, 2006,20: 1521-1525.
  • 6Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a recta-analysis. Ann Surg Oneol, 2006,13 : 413-424.
  • 7Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (rIME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc, 2004,18 : 281-289.
  • 8Ziogas D, Roukos D. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: may it improve also survival? Surg Endosc, 2008,22: 1405-1406.
  • 9Hellan M, Anderson C, EUenhom JD, et al. Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oneo|, 2007,14:3168-3173.
  • 10Bianehi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc, 2010,24 : 2888-2894.

共引文献56

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部