期刊文献+

技术标准化中知识产权披露机制研究——以3G产业为背景 被引量:4

A Study on the IPR Disclosure Mechanism in Technical Standardization—Using 3G Industry as Background
原文传递
导出
摘要 披露机制,对于确保以移动通信技术标准为平台的利益参与机制的良性运转,至关重要。对于后续的许可谈判和标准实施的顺利进行,披露机制起着前提性的关键作用。如果披露机制缺位,将导致标准的实施陷入资源利用效率低下的反公有状态。对于标准制定过程,披露机制的缺位会导致失去采用较低成本的可替代方案的机会,使标准的总实施成本上升,并会导致标准运营在专利埋伏面前束手就擒。为进一步促进我国通信产业的发展,避免出现ICT技术标准实施过程中反公有的困境和专利埋伏,中国应该建立健全知识产权披露机制及相关法律制度。 IPR Disclosure mechanism is critical to the balance of conflicting interests in the mobile communication technical standards.To the subsequent licensing negotiations and successful implementation of standards,the disclosure mechanism also plays a key role.Lack of disclosure mechanism might cause the implementation of standards to be bogged down into the inefficient resource usage of anti-commons state.For the standard setting process,lack of disclosure mechanism will result in the lost of opportunities to find alternative and low-cost solutions in place of patented ones,i.e.,elevated total implementation cost and leave the adoption of standards vulnerable to patent ambushes.To further promote the fast and efficient development of China's communication industry and avoid anti-commons predicament and patent ambushes,China should establish effective IPR disclosure mechanism in SSOs and related legal rules.
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《网络法律评论》 2008年第1期3-20,共18页 Internet Law Review
关键词 技术标准 披露机制 反公有 专利埋伏 Technical Standards Disclosure Mechanism Anti-commons Patent Ambush
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1唐如安.标准是移动通信产业竞争的制高点[J].数据通信,2007(3):1-2. 被引量:1
  • 2D.J.Goodman."3G Cellular Standards and Patents"[].IEEE WirelessCom.
  • 3Mark A.Lemley,Carl Shapiro.patent holdup and royalty stacking[].Texas Law Review.
  • 4M.A.Heller."The Tragedy of the Anticommons:Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets"[].Harvard Law Review.1998
  • 5R.Bekkers,I.Liotard."European Standards for Mobile Communications:The Tense Relationship between Standards and Intellectual Property Rights"[].EIPR.1999
  • 6H.Demsetz.‘Towards a Theory of Property Rights‘[].The American Economist.1967
  • 7K.Jakobs.Standardization Process in the IT Industry:Impact,Problems,and Benefits of User Participation[]..2001
  • 8Rambus,FTC Clash Over Monopoly Ruling. http://www.edn.com/article/CA6374385.html? ref = nbra .
  • 9.645 F.2d 1195(2dCir.1981),cert.denied,445 U.S.1016(1982)[]..
  • 10.15 U.S.C.§ 2[]..

同被引文献62

  • 1梁志文.反思知识产权请求权理论——知识产权要挟策略与知识产权请求权的限制[J].清华法学,2008,2(4):124-136. 被引量:33
  • 2徐瑄.专利权垄断性的法哲学分析[J].中国法学,2002(4):95-101. 被引量:13
  • 3汤维建,沈磊.论诉权滥用及其法律规制[J].山东警察学院学报,2007,19(2):21-28. 被引量:28
  • 4赵启杉,黄良才.技术标准中的事先披露原则——VITA新专利政策介评[J].电子知识产权,2007(6):23-27. 被引量:11
  • 5国家标准委、国家知识产权局.《国家标准涉及专利的管理规定(暂行)》的公告[EB ]. [ 2013-12-26]. http://www. sac.gov. cn/gybzheb/zxtz_850/201312/t20131226_149313. htm.
  • 6European Telecommunications Standards Institute. ETSI Guideon Intellectual Property Rights [EB]. [2014-03-05]. Version a-dopted by Board #94 on 19 September 2013, ETSI Rules of Pro-cedure, 20 March 2013. http://www. etsi. org/aboul/569-etsi-ipr-policy-faqs. highlight = YToxOntpOjA7czo20iJwYX Rlbn-Qi030 = .
  • 7Rysman M,Simcoe T. Patents and the Perfonnance of VoluntaryStandard-Setting Organizations!^],Management Science,2008,54(11):1920-1934.
  • 8Bekkers R,Catalini C, Maitinelli A,et al. Intellectual PropertyDisclosure in Standards Development [ J ]. NBER Conference onStandards, Patents &Innovation, Tucson (AZ), January 20 and21,2012. Available at http://users. nber. org/ .confer/2012/IPKE/Bekkers. pdf.
  • 9American National Standards Institutes. United States StandardsStrategy[EB]. [2014-03-05]. http;//www. ansi, org/stand-ards_activities/nss/usss. aspx. menuid = 3.
  • 10International Telecommunication Union. Guidelines for Imple-mentation of the Common Patent Policy for ITU - T/ITU 一 R/ISO/IEC [EB]. [2014-03-05]. Revision 1,effective 23 April2012,Revises initial edition of 1 March 2007. http://www. itu.int/oth/T0404000001/en.

引证文献4

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部