期刊文献+

标准化中合理无歧视原则的法律性质初探

原文传递
导出
摘要 标准化中的合理无歧视原则来源于产业实践,目前还没有清晰的法律地位。从专利法和反垄断法看,都没有直接与合理无歧视原则对应的规则。合理无歧视的法律性质应当界定为一种合同性质的义务,其特征包括自愿性、不可撤回性、对世性和内容的不确定性。合理无歧视原则对于推进标准制定能够发挥积极的作用,但是实践也要求它被赋予更加具体充实的含义。 RAND Principle in Standardization comes from the industry prac-tice and has no clear legal status yet .There are no direct rules in both Patent Law and Anti-monopoly Law to regulate RAND .RAND’s legal nature shall be defined as a contractual duty .It is voluntary , irrevocable , toward unspecific person and with uncertain content .RAND has positive function in facilitating standard setting process , but the practice also needs more specific content of this rule .
作者 刘晓春
出处 《网络法律评论》 2013年第1期170-176,共7页 Internet Law Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1张平.技术标准中的专利权限制——兼评最高法院就实施标准中专利的行为是否构成侵权问题的函[J].电子知识产权,2009(2):15-17. 被引量:11
  • 2.Ex ante disclosures of licensing terms[].〈http://wwwetsiorg/WebSite/document/Legal/Exante_disclaimerdoc〉.2013
  • 3.Law Offices of Curtis V.Trinko,LLP[].US.2004
  • 4Lemley,Mark A.Intelleclual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations (April 2002)[].California Law Review.2002
  • 5.Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC[].〈http://wwwituint/ITU-T/dbase/patent/patent-policyhtml〉.2013
  • 6.Normative American National Standards Policies of ANSI,3.1.1 Statement from patent holder[].〈http://publicaaansiorg/sites/apdl/Documents/News%and%Publications/Links%Within%Stories/ANSI% Patenl% Policydoc〉.2013

二级参考文献2

  • 1Allen M. A Need For Intervention: Keeping Competition Alive in the Networking Industry in the Face of Increasing Patent Assertions Against Standards[EB/OL]. (2002)[2008-12-30 ].http://www.ftc.gov/opp/intelleet/020418lo.pdf.
  • 2Mark A. Lemley, Philip J. Weiser. Should Property or Liability Rules Govern Information[J]. Texas Law ReView, 783(85) :289.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部