期刊文献+

对孙子的克劳塞维茨式批判 被引量:8

下载PDF
导出
出处 《战略与管理》 CSSCI 2003年第5期30-35,共6页 Strategy and Management
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Michael Handel,Comparative Study of Suntzi and Clausewitz (Carlisle: U.S. Army War College Press,1991).
  • 2Handel,Comparative Study of Suntzi and Clausewitz,p. 3.
  • 3Paret, "Clausewitz," p. 199; Raymond Aron,Clausewitz: Philosopher of War (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall, 1985), p. 57.
  • 4David R. Mapel, "Realism and the Ethics of War and Peace," in Terry Nardin, ed., The Ethics of War and Peace: Riligious and Secular Perspectives(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), p.56.
  • 5Handel, Comparative Study of Suntzi and Clausewitz, p. 24,p.45.
  • 6Handel, ComparativeStudy of Suntzi and Clausewitz, p. 44.

同被引文献42

引证文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部