摘要
篇章学的篇际性研究和文学理论的互文性同源。篇际性探索一篇章与其他篇章间的关系如何在作者和读者的交际中为交际目标服务,从而为分析篇章的生产和理解过程提供一定的社会、心理和认识图式;而互文性理论则重视社会的、历史的、认知的、文化的百科知识性对话,分析视角过于宽泛因而缺乏可操作性。既然互文性和篇际性的研究目标都是文本,而后者比较注意程序化操作的研究方法正是前者所欠缺的,那么两者就存在互相补益的可能性。本文意在寻找可行的路径,使篇际性的程序化方法能够帮助互文性批评去粗取精、更趋科学化。
The term intertextuality used both in text linguistics and in literary criticism comes from the same source. Intertextual studies in text linguistics explore into the relation between the present text and other texts in the process of the production and reception of a given text and how the re- lation helps in the author and reader communication, with the aim to provide social, psychologi- cal and cognitive schema for the analysis in the process of textual production and reception, while intertextual studies in literary criticism give more emphasis upon social, cognitive and cul- tural dialog in a way of encyclopedic knowledge and lacks analytical procedures. Since the two have a similar purpose and the former has its merits of procedural methodology in its analysis which is the short slab of the latter, it is possible and plausible for the latter to draw some bene- ficial complementation. The present paper tries to seek ways wherein they can cooperate to help make literary intertextuality theory more scientific in its methodology.
出处
《外文研究》
2013年第1期62-71,100,共11页
Foreign Studies