中国专车第一案法院判决解析

Study on First Judgment of Car-hailing Case in China

本文对2015年4次延期审理的号称'中国专车第一案'的一审法院判决书进行了深入细致的分析,认为法院在网约车发展遭遇层层阻碍之时做出的判决意义重大,具有示范引领作用。在具体判决内容上,法院不仅以行政相对人违法行为的社会危害性,创造性地阐释现有法律规则和创新发展的关系,而且以比例原则认定行政处罚畸重而没有认定行政行为违法,实质上是'以退为进'平衡各方关系。

The article conducts deep research on the first judgment of carhailing case in China, which once was adjoined four times because of complicated situations and unexpected changes. The author believes that it is significant for the court to renter the judgment while car-hailing is confronted with kinds of difficulties at present. Concerning the concrete content of the judgment,the court not only explains creatively the relationship between the current legal rules and innovation and development,but also concentrates on the issue of reasonableness through proportionality principle and ignored the legality of administrative action which can be regarded as the balanced way for different parties’ interests and concerns.