期刊文献+

A comparative analysis of major Chinese and English online question-answering communities

A comparative analysis of major Chinese and English online question-answering communities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper compares 12 representative Chinese and English online questionanswering communities(Q&A communities) based on their basic functions, interactive modes, and customized services. An empirical experiment from a comparative perspective was also conducted on them by using 12 questions representing for four types of questions,which are assigned evenly to three different subject fields so as to examine the task performance of these 12 selected online Q&A communities. Our goal was to evaluate those online Q&A communities in terms of their quality and efficiency for answering questions posed to them. It was hoped that our empirical research would yield greater understanding and insights to the working intricacy of these online Q&A communities and hence their possible further improvement. This paper compares 12 representative Chinese and English online questionanswering communities(Q&A communities) based on their basic functions, interactive modes, and customized services. An empirical experiment from a comparative perspective was also conducted on them by using 12 questions representing for four types of questions,which are assigned evenly to three different subject fields so as to examine the task performance of these 12 selected online Q&A communities. Our goal was to evaluate those online Q&A communities in terms of their quality and efficiency for answering questions posed to them. It was hoped that our empirical research would yield greater understanding and insights to the working intricacy of these online Q&A communities and hence their possible further improvement.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science》 2010年第4期61-82,共22页 中国文献情报(英文版)
基金 jointly supported by Wuhan International Science and Technology Cooperation Fund(Grant No.201070934337) the 3rd Special Award of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(Grant No.201003497) National Science Foundation of USA(Grant No.NSF/IIS-1052773)
关键词 Online question answering community Comparative study Evaluation Online question answering community Comparative study Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1徐刚,邓胜利.交互问答平台的运作机理分析[J].图书与情报,2009(6):88-92. 被引量:12
  • 2.YAHOO!ANSWERS[]..2010
  • 3W elcom e to Uclue. http://uclue.com/ . 2010
  • 4.Quora[]..2010
  • 5.SOSO Ask[]..2010
  • 6.Answers.com[]..2010
  • 7ChaCha. http://www.chacha.com/ . 2010
  • 8MadSciNet. http://www.madsci.org/ . 2010
  • 9Deng,S.L.Comparison and countermeasure research of interactive question and answer platform at home and abroad[].Information Studies:Theory&Application.2009
  • 10Baidu Zhidao. http://zhidao.baidu.com/ . 2010

二级参考文献5

  • 1“爱问”推出中国大百科在线搜索服务[EB/OL].[2006.06-30].http://teeh.bokee.com/55/2005-08-03/380053.html.
  • 2Welcome to My Wondir! [ EB/OL ]. [ 2006-08-20 ]. http: //www.wondir.com/wondir/jsp/index.jsp.
  • 3John Battelle.Grokking Wondir[ EB/OL ]. [ 2006-06-27 ]. http ://battellemedia.com/archives/001058.php.
  • 4Jabber技术概况[EB/OL].[2008-12-20].http://jer-ryes.cnblogs.com/archive/2005/12/13/296435.html.
  • 5Wade Roush. What's the Best Q&A Site?We put Yahoo Answers, Amazon's Askville, and rival question" and-answer services to the test[J]. MIT Technology Re, view, December 22, 2006.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部