摘要
科技以信息传媒革命给社会带来的透明度与自主性强化了民众包括话语权在内的民主维权意识,后启蒙作为一种微时代之文化政治豁然开朗。这是历史理性的新选择——工具理性与人文理性相谐,人们在良知策动下追求真理、实现正义的奋进之程,在历代启蒙的迷失与期待中不断克服自身非理性状况,审美文化在其间始终是官营、私营文化产业收编与反收编的拉锯战场。存盘于思想库中的原创马克思学说精粹——"告别暴力革命"、"资本之自身否定"及人类共同价值自由、平等、博爱之实现作为历史出口,必在"大数据"中失忆的"洞穴"重新焕发启蒙之光,导引世界变革。后启蒙不再是少数精英的事,不断延展着"新器官"的"微民(‘白痴的一代’)"正长成重构公民社会之公共理性与新的社会契约之"巨人"。还原被颠倒之中国古代伟大启蒙思想传统——"民可使由之不可使知之",就是要驱除蒙昧,把被剥夺的思想自由和话语权归还于民。新人类之主体将沿着这一自由之路从"无革命有暴力"步入"无暴力"之"大革命"。这正是后启蒙有别于以往历次启蒙以暴力革命作为后果之彻底革命性。
Revolution in Information and media resulted from the development of science and technology brought transparency and freedom to the society and reinforced the awareness of safeguarding the legal rights of the public, including their power of discourse. Post-enlightenment, as a sort of cultural politics at micro-blogging era, is flourishing vigorously. This is the new choice of historical rationality-perfect combination between instrument rationality and humanistic rationality. People are pursuing truth and strive for justice according to their conscience, and have overcome their non-rationality in the process of enlightenment. Aesthetic culture experienced the struggle between state-run cultural industry and private cultural industry, with the former trying to take over the latter and the latter resisting the attempt. The succinct doctrine of Karl Marx include “farewell to violent revolution”, “self-negation of the capital”, human shared values, freedom, equality, and philanthropy, leading the world’s progress and contributing to the lost parts in “big data”. Post-enlightenment involves more people than the elites, with micro-bloggers (idiot generation) of new organ becoming the “colossus”of reconstructed public rationality and new social testament. The great ancient Chinese enlightenment thought -“let the sensible person do what they think right, and help the insensible person understand the right things”, is regained, and obscurantism is discarded for the public enjoyment of the freedom of thought and power of discourse. Human society will proceed onto the road of freedom, from“non-revolutionary violence”to“non-violent revolution”. This complete revolution is the difference between post-enlightenment and the revolutions in the past.
出处
《文学与文化》
2014年第3期70-81,共12页
Literature and Culture Studies
基金
首都师范大学文化研究院重大研究项目"微文化与当下中国社会文化变迁研究"(ICS-2014-A-03)阶段性成果
关键词
历史理性
孔夫子
马克思
新主体
微审美
Historical Rationality
Confucius
Carl Marx
New Subject
Micro Aesthetics