期刊文献+

直接反馈和间接反馈对学生英语写作质量的影响 被引量:1

The Effectiveness of Direct and Indirect Feedback on Students' English Writing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英语写作是一个复杂的过程,要求英语学习者充分利用所学的英语技能。提高英语写作水平不仅需要学习者加强练习,还需要教师的有效反馈。本研究旨在研究学习者接受教师的不同书面修正性反馈后其写作质量的变化情况。研究对象为刚刚升入大学的一年级新生。本研究通过收集大一新生15周所写的240篇作文,分析直接反馈和间接反馈对学生作文质量的影响。研究发现,直接反馈可以更好地帮助学生减少偏题、语篇连贯和体裁错误;间接反馈可以帮助减少学生的拼写、语法和词汇错误。 English writing is a complex process, which requires English learners to make full use of skills they have acquired. The improvement of English depends on not only writing practices but also the effectiveness of instruction received. This research studied the variation of English writing after the English learners received different kinds of feedback from the teacher. The research participants mainly involved the freshmen, who just began their college years. During the research, 240 compositions from students were collected in total,which lasted for 15 weeks. The present study investigated the effectiveness of both direct feedback and indirect feedback on English writing through the analysis of compositions. The results showed that direct feedback is more helpful to decrease content-based errors concerning topical relevance, coherence and genre, while indirect feedback benefits in the reduction of form-based errors relating to spelling, grammar and lexis.
作者 王海华 李俐
出处 《外语教育研究》 2014年第1期38-44,共7页 Foreign Language Education & Research
基金 辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目"大学生英语词汇能力发展动态研究"(L12DYY027) 辽宁省教育科学"十二五"规划2011年度研究基地专项课题"大学生英语词汇知识发展历时研究"(JG2XY11033)
关键词 外语写作 直接反馈 间接反馈 English writing direct feedback indirect feedback
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献29

  • 1杨敬清.提高英语写作评改有效性的反馈机制──实验与分析[J].外语界,1996(3):41-45. 被引量:170
  • 2Ashwell, T. 2000. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?[J].Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 227-257.
  • 3Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kind of er ror feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing[J].Journal of Second Language Writing 12. 267-296.
  • 4Doughty, C. &J. Williams. 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition [C]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 5Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 6Fathman, A. &E. Whalley. 1990. Teacher response to student writing, Focus on form versus content [A]. In B. Kroll (ed.). Second Language Writing, Research Insights for the Classroom [C]. Cambridge, CUP. 178-190.
  • 7Ferris, D. 1999. The case for grammar correction in L2 Writing classes: A response to Truscott [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 1-11.
  • 8Ferris, D. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • 9Ferris, D. & B. Roberts. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be [J]? Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161- 184.
  • 10Ferris, D., S. Chaney, K. Komura, B. Roberts&S. McKee. 2000. Perspectives, problems, and practices in treating written error [R]. In Colloquium presented at International TESOL Convention, Vancouver, March 14-18.

共引文献112

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部