期刊文献+

质量准则与新格莱斯主义及其在不同文化中的搁置现象

Quality Maxim,Neo-Griceanisim and Their Suspension in Different Cultures
原文传递
导出
摘要 尽管格莱斯的质量准则和新格莱斯主义Q原则与数量原则对约束人们的语言交际具有普遍性,但不同文化背景的人在遵循这些原则、以及对影响遵循这些原则的社会文化因素的解释上存在着差异,这就导致格莱斯的质量准则和新格莱斯主义Q原则与数量原则在不同文化中频频遭受搁置。而这些搁置都有其深刻的文化内涵。 Although Grice’s quality maxim and neo-Griceanisim Q principle and the principle of quantity have universal bindings upon people’s conversation,people with different cultural background may have different understandings when abided by them or they may interpret these social cultural factors impacting how to follow these principles and maxim differentially,which leads to frequent suspensions of Grice’s quality maxim,Q principle and the principle of quantity in different cultures.All the suspensions or violations have their underlying cultural connotations.
作者 高怀勇
出处 《外语艺术教育研究》 2009年第1期29-32,共4页 Educational Research on Foreign Languages and Arts
基金 四川省教育厅社科青年基金项目(课题编号:SB06002)成果之一
关键词 文化差异 质量准则 Q原则 数量原则 新格莱斯主义 cultural differentiation quality maxim Q Principle the principle of quantity Neo-Griceanisim.
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Levinson,S.C.Pragmatics[]..1983
  • 2Keenan,E.O.The universality of conversational postulates[].Language and Society.1976
  • 3Prosser,M.The Cultural Dialogue[]..1978
  • 4姜望琪.Zipf与省力原则[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2005,16(1):87-95. 被引量:145

二级参考文献18

  • 1[4]A Short Biography of Alfred James Lotka,prepared by the National Institue of Standards and Technology.http://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/lotkaslaw.html.
  • 2[5]Atlas,J.D.& S.C.Levinson.It-clefts,Informativeness,and Logical Form:Radical Pragmatics[A].Radical Pragmatics[C].Ed.P.Cole.New York:Academic Press,1981.1-61.
  • 3[6]Carston,R.Informativeness,Relevance and Scalar Implicature[A].Relevance Theory:Applications and Implications[C].Ed.R.Carston & S.Uchida.Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1998.179-236.
  • 4[7]Catriona T.and J.R.Hurford.Modelling Zipfian Distributions in Language.(paper presented at the Language Evolution and Computation Workshop/Course at the 15th European Summer School on Logic,Language and Information,Vienna,Auguast 2003.from http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/~jim.)
  • 5[8]Grice,H.P.Logic and Conversation[A].Syntax and Semantics 3:Speech Acts[C].Ed.P.Cole & J.Morgan.New York:Academic Press,1975.41-58.
  • 6[9]Grice,H.P.Further Notes on Logic and Conversation[A].Syntax and Semantics 9:Pragmatics[C].Ed.P.Cole.New York:Academic Press,1978.113-128.
  • 7[10]Hanley,M.L.Word Index to James Joyce's Ulysses[M].Madison,Wis,1937.
  • 8[11]Horn,L.R.Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference:Q-based and R-based Implicature[A].Meaning,Form,and Use in Context:Linguistic Applications[C].Ed.D.Schiffrin.Washington,D.C.:Georgetown University Press,1984.11-42.
  • 9[12]Ha,L.Q.,E.I.Sicilia-Garcia.J.Ming. and F.J.Smith.Extension of Zipf's Law to Words and Phrases.In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics,2003,(1):315-320.
  • 10[13]Levinson,S.C.Pragmatics[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1983.

共引文献144

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部