期刊文献+

汉语话题结构与句法的灵活性 被引量:1

Chinese Topic Structures and Flexibility of Syntax
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从汉语话题结构探讨了汉语句法灵活性的实质和根源。笔者认为汉语句法的灵活性不是由于缺乏句法规则而是具有特殊的句法结构,汉语句法的灵活性不能否认汉语句法的形式研究,但是语义、话语和语用等也是灵活性的相关因素。 The article discusses the nature and the causes of the flexibility of Chinese syntax.The author holds that the flexibility of Chinese syntax,which is not contradiction with its form study,is not caused by the lack of syntactic rules but by a special syntactic structure.However,semantic,discoursal and pragmatic factors also contribute to its flexibility.
作者 高秀雪
出处 《外语艺术教育研究》 2009年第1期39-42,共4页 Educational Research on Foreign Languages and Arts
关键词 话题结构 汉语句法 灵活性 topic structures Chinese syntax flexibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1石定栩.汉语句法的灵活性和句法理论[J].当代语言学,2000,2(1):18-26. 被引量:44
  • 2Xu Liejiong.Free Empty Category[].Linguistic Inquiry.1986
  • 3Chao,Y.A Grammar of Spoken Chinese[]..1968
  • 4Charles Li,& Sandra Thompson.Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language[]..1976
  • 5L i,Charles N,Sandra A.Thompson.Mandarin Ch inese:AFunctional G rammar[]..1981
  • 6Huang Jin.Logical Relations in Chinese and theTheory of Grammar[]..1982
  • 7Xu, Liejiong,and D. Terence Langendoen.Topic structures in Chinese[].Language.1985
  • 8Huang,C.-T. James.On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns[].Linguistic Inquiry.1984
  • 9Huang,C-T Jam es.Remarks on Empty Category in Ch inese[].L ingu istic Inqu iry.1987
  • 10Chafe,W.Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subject, topic and the point of view[].Subject and topic.1976

二级参考文献25

  • 1陈平.汉语零形回指的话语分析[J].中国语文,1987,(5):363-378.
  • 2Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles Lied., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.
  • 3Crystal, David: 1997. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • 4Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 5Chomsky, Noam.1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • 6Ernst, Thomas and Chengchi Wang, 1995. Object preposing in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics. 3.235-260.
  • 7Fillmore, Charles. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach and Robert Harms, eds., Universals of Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Kinehart and Winston.
  • 8Givon, Talmy. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • 9Huang, James. 1982. Logic relation in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. diss., MIT.
  • 10Huang, James.1991. On Be and Have in Chinese. In Essays in Memory of Professor Fangkwei Li, Institute ofHistory and Philology.

共引文献44

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部