期刊文献+

鼓室成形术中电钻及吸引噪声的安全性评估 被引量:2

Evaluation of safety on the noise of drills in the tympanoplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨耳显微外科手术中电钻及吸引的噪声 ,对术耳和非术耳的耳蜗功能所产生的影响。方法 :采用ND10型声级计 ,对鼓室成形术中不同规格和不同种类的钻头及吸引所产生的噪声进行检测 ,并分别比较术耳术前和术后 1个月的纯音骨导阈值以及非术耳术前和术后 1个月的骨导阈值。结果 :术中电钻钻头与吸引所致噪声强度分别为 82~ 10 6dB(A)和 71~ 84dB(A) ,术前与术后 1个月左右双耳纯音骨导阈值变化差异无统计学意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :鼓室成形术中电钻及吸引器的使用是安全的 。 Objective:To investigate the effect of noise generated by the otologic drills and suctions on the cochlear of the operated and nonoperated ear.Method:To examine the noise generated by the different kind of drills and suctions in tympanoplasty, the ND10 Sound Level Meter (Beijing) was used. The bone-conduction thresholds was measured before and one month after operation respectively in both ears.Result:Sound pressure levels for the otologic drills and suctions were 82~106 dB and 71~84 dB, respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between pre-noise and one-month post-noise bone-conduction thresholds in both operated and nonoperated ears.Conclusion:It is safety to use otologic drills and suctions for the patients. There is no apparent harmful effect on the function of cochlear in both ears for the noise of using drills and suctions in tympanoplasty.
出处 《临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2004年第1期4-5,共2页 Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology
关键词 听觉丧失 电钻噪声 鼓室成形术 Hearing loss Drill noise Tympanoplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]Zou J, Bretlau P, Pyykko I, et al. Sensorineural hearing loss after vibration: an animal model for evaluating prevention and treatment of inner ear hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol, 2001,121:143-148.
  • 2[2]Michaelides E M.Kartush J M.Implications of sound levers generated by otologic devices. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2001,125:361-363.
  • 3[3]Myers E N.Drill-induced hearing loss in the nonoperated ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1997,117:555-558.
  • 4[4]Tos M,Trojaborg N,Thomsen J.The contralateral ear after translabyrinthine removal of acoustic neuromas:is there a drill noise generated hearing loss?J Laryngol Otol,1989,103:845-849.
  • 5[5]Urquhart A C, Mcintosh W A, Bodenstein N P. Drill generated sensorineural hearing loss following mastoid surgery. Laryngoscope, 1992,102:689-692.
  • 6[6]Spencer M G,Reid A.Drill-generated noise levels in mastoid surgery.J Laryngol Otol,1985,99:967-972.

同被引文献21

  • 1吴子明,王玉芝,李延良.耳科电钻噪声对豚鼠内耳毛细胞及听阈影响的实验研究[J].沈阳部队医药,1998,11(3):210-213. 被引量:1
  • 2李树华,石洪金,董卫东,赵江琪.耳科手术中电钻噪声所致内耳声损伤的防治[J].中华耳科学杂志,2005,3(1):38-40. 被引量:3
  • 3Tos M, Lau T, Plate S. Sensorineural hearing loss following chronic ear surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol laryngol.1984, 93(4 Pt 1 ): 403-409.
  • 4Jiang D, Bibas A, Santuli C, et al. Equivalent noise level generated by drilling onto the ossicular chain as measured by laser doppler vibrometry: a temproral bone study. Laryngoscope, 2007, 117 (6): 1040-1045.
  • 5Palva A, Sorri M. Can an operation of deaf ear be dangerous for hearing? Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 1979, 360: 155-157.
  • 6Man A, Winerman I. Does drill noise during mastoid surgery affect the contralateral ear? Am J Otol, 1985, 6(4): 334-335.
  • 7Duan ML, Canlon B. Difference in forward masking after a temporary and a permanent noise-induced hearing loss. Audiol NeuroOtol, 1996, 1(6): 328-338.
  • 8Kylen P, Arlinger S. Drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery. Acta Otolaryngol, 1976, 82(5-6): 402-409.
  • 9Karatas E, Miman MC, Ozturan O, et al. Contralateral normal ear after mastoid surgery: evaluation by otoacoustic emissions (mastoid drilling and hearing loss). ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2007, 69(1 ): 18-94.
  • 10Hegewald M, Heitman R, Weiderhold ML, et al. High-frequency electrostimulation hearing after mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck surg, 1989, 100(1 ): 49-56.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部